Disposed

D.Balamurugan v. the Tashildar

Madras HC20 Jun 2024WP/15724/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought survey and demarcation of boundaries of his 650 sq.mtr. plot in Maligampattu Village after an alleged unilateral change in the field sketch, having received no response to his representation. The court directed the Tahsildar to consider the representation and pass appropriate orders with notice to neighbours within two months.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the Tahsildar to consider the representation dated 17.02.2023 and act on the survey/demarcation request within two months, with notice to interested persons.

D.Balamurugan Vs the Tashildar — Property and Title | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.No.15724 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 20.06.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR

¶6

W.P.No.15724 of 2024

¶7

D.Balamurugan .. Petitioner

¶8

¶9

1.The Tahsildar Panruti Taluk Cuddalore Taluk

¶10

2.The Assistant Director Survey Land Record Cuddalore .. Respondents

¶11

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1^st respondent to survey the land to an extent of 650 sq.mtr. of plot comprised in S.No.195/5-195/8 and subsequently assigned new S.No.142 and subsequently sub divided into 142/14 further sub divided into 142/14A-142/14F situated at Maligampattu Village, Cuddalore District, within the sub register district of Kandampuliyur.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.N.R.Rajagopalan For Respondents : Mr.A.Selvendran Special Government Pleader

¶13

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶14

1/4

¶15

W.P.No.15724 of 2024

¶16

O R D E R

¶17

This writ petition has been filed for a direction to the 1^st respondent to survey the land to an extent of 650 sq.mtr. plot comprised in S.No.195/5-195/8, which was subsequently assigned new S.No.142 and sub divided into 142/14 and further sub divided into 142/14A-142/14F situated at Maligampattu Village, Cuddalore District.

¶18

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents and perused the materials available on record.

¶19

The case of the petitioner is that the subject property was purchased by

¶20

the petitioner and his neighbours and the Revenue authorities also issued joint patta in their favour; on coming to know of the unilateral change in topography and survey field sketch of the subject property, he submitted a representation dated 17.02.2023 to the 1^st respondent, to survey the said property and demarcate its boundaries. However, the same has not been considered. Hence, the present Writ Petition.

¶21

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶22

2/4

¶23

W.P.No.15724 of 2024

¶24

Considering the limited relief sought in this writ petition, the 1^st respondent is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 17.02.2023 and pass appropriate orders on the petitioner's representation for survey of the property and demarcate the boundaries after giving notice to the neighbouring land owners and any other interested persons, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶25

With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶26

20.06.2024

¶27

gya Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No

¶28

¶29

1.The Tahsildar Panruti Taluk Cuddalore Taluk

¶30

2.The Assistant Director Survey Land Record Cuddalore

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶32

3/4

¶33

W.P.No.15724 of 2024

N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.

gya

W.P.No.15724 of 2024

20.06.2024

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 4/4

D.Balamurugan v. the Tashildar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

D.Balamurugan v. the Tashildar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

G.Amudha Vs Subhalakshmi IAS

Kasthuri Vs District Collector

K.Somasundaram Vs the Tamil Nadu Housing Board

Aishwarya Lakshmi Rajakumar Vs The Inspector General of Registration and

S.Swathi Priya Vs The Inspector of Registration

G.Mathu Vs The Inspector General of Registration