The petitioner, a Motor Vehicle Inspector, challenged his suspension and reinstatement rejection. The counsel submitted that due to subsequent developments during pendency, no further adjudication was required. The Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.No.15677 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 02.02.2024
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
W.P.No.15677 of 2018 and W.M.P.No.18613 of 2018
A.Sivakumar Motor Vehicle Inspector, Grade-I, Omalur Unit Officer (Now under suspension) ...Petitioner
Vs.
The Transport Commissioner, Ezilagam, Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005. … Respondent
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a
Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the respondent order of suspension made in Pro.R.No.40218/VB2/2017 dated 12.10.2017 and consequential rejection order of revocation of suspension made in Memo
R.No.40218/VB2/2017 dated 17.04.2018 and quash the same and direct the respondent to reinstate the petitioner with service with all the service benefits.
For Petitioner : Mr.M.Muthappan
For Respondent : Mrs.C.Sangamithirai Special Government Pleader
1/4
W.P.No.15677 of 2018
O R D E R
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the subsequent development happened during the pendency of this writ petition, no further adjudication required in this writ petition.
2.In view of the above factual position, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
02.02.2024
Index: Yes/No Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order pam
2/4
W.P.No.15677 of 2018
To
The Transport Commissioner, Ezilagam, Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005.
3/4
W.P.No.15677 of 2018
BATTU DEVANAND, J.
pam
W.P.No.15677 of 2018
02.02.2024
4/4
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition survives adjudication given subsequent developments?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
A.Sivakumar
The Transport Commissioner
Battu Devanand
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
