Disposed

M.Ranganathan v. The State Rep. by its

Madras HC5 Sept 2024WP/14817/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition seeking direction to forbid storm water drain and road construction, the High Court noted the petition was pending without an interim order. The petitioner was directed to submit a fresh representation detailing a fresh cause of action. The writ petition was disposed of accordingly.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to submit a fresh representation on fresh cause of action.

M.Ranganathan Vs The State Rep. by its — Municipal and Town Planning | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.No.14817 of 2015

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 05.09.2024

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

¶6

W.P.No.14817 of 2015 and MP.No.1 of 2015

¶7

M.Ranganathan ... Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

1.The State Rep. By its District Collector, Kancheepuram District @ Kancheepuram (Town) 2.The Executive Officer, Perungalathur Town Panchayat, Perungalathur, Chennai-63 ... Respondents

¶10

PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India p raying to issue a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondents 1 & 2 from implementing the said proposed construction of storm water drains along Varun Avenue III Cross St, New Perungalathur, Chennai-63 including laying of “blue and metal road” through the above said street either in the near future or any time later, based on the petitioner's representation dated 07.05.2015.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Asokan

¶12

For Respondents : Mr.S.Arumugam, Government Advocate

¶13

ORDER

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

1/4

¶16

W.P.No.14817 of 2015

¶17

This writ petition has been filed f or direction forbearing the respondents 1 & 2 from implementing the said proposed construction of storm water drains along Varun Avenue III Cross St, New Perungalathur, Chennai-63 including laying of “blue and metal road” through the above said street either in the near future or any time later, based on the petitioner's representation dated 07.05.2015.

¶18

It is seen that this writ petition is pending without any

¶19

interim order. Therefore, the petitioner is directed to submit a fresh representation on fresh cause of action, if so advised.

¶20

With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of.

¶21

Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶22

05.09.2024

¶23

Neutral Citation:Yes/No Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order lok

¶24

2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶25

W.P.No.14817 of 2015

¶26

1.District Collector, Kancheepuram District @ Kancheepuram (Town)

¶27

2.The Executive Officer, Perungalathur Town Panchayat, Perungalathur, Chennai-63

¶28

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

¶29

lok

¶30

3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.No.14817 of 2015

W.P.No.14817 of 2015

05.09.2024

4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

M.Ranganathan v. The State Rep. by its

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Ranganathan v. The State Rep. by its

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

C.Vasanth Vs The District Collector

M/S. Oriental Lotus Hospitality Solutions Private Limited Vs the Joint Director

M/S. Abc Fruits, Vs the General Manager

E.Nilavarasan, Vs Chennai Metropolitan

S.Pandiaraj Vs The Commissioner

Pappambadi Village Panchayat Vs The District Collector/