Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Jainul Abudeen Vs The District Collector — Madras HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

Home
Madras HC
2024
Jainul Abudeen Vs The District CollectorJainul Abudeen v. The District Collector

Disposed

Jainul Abudeen v. The District Collector

Madras HC2 Jan 2024WP/147/2020

Case brief

from the order text

What is this about?

of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

A

WP No.147 of 2020

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 02.01.2024

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.SANJAY V.GANGAPURWALA, CHIEF JUSTICE

AND

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY

WP No.147 of 2020

Jainul Abudeen : Petitioner

versus

1.The District Collector, The Nilgiris District, Ooty

2.The District Manager, TASMAC Ooty, The Nilgiris District

3.The Assistant Commissioner, Excise and Prohibition Department, Collectorate, Ooty, The Nilgiris District : Respondents

Statutes considered

1 provisions across 1 enactments

AI extract

Constitution of IndiaArticle 226

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
Jainul Abudeen
respondent
The District Collector, The Nilgiris District, Ooty
respondent
The District Manager, TASMAC Ooty, The Nilgiris District
respondent
The Assistant Commissioner, Excise and Prohibition Department, Collectorate, Ooty, The Nilgiris District

Coram

AI extract

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Madras HC
Decided on: 2 Jan 2024 · January
Registered: 3 Jan 2020
Case no.: WP/147/2020

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from D.bharatha Chakravarthy

C. Karthikeyan Vs The State of Tamil Nadu
22 Dec 2023
Usha Latchumanan College of Education Vs Pondicherry University
22 Dec 2023
Tamilnadu Generation and Distribution Vs Pariyur Amman Spinning Mills (P) Ltd.
22 Dec 2023
M.Panneerselvam Vs The District Collector
2 Jan 2024

Cite this judgement

Jainul Abudeen v. The District Collector, WP/147/2020 (MAD), decided on 2 January 2024.

The Madras High Court publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Statutes1

Constitution of IndiaArticle 226

View all statutes

Bench / Coram

Sanjay V.Gangapurwala and D.Bharatha Chakravarthy

Parties & counsel

Disposed

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondents from opening the TASMAC shop at Masinakudi Village or any other place in and around the elephant corridors nearby Masinakudi Village, the Nilgiris District.

For the Petitioner : Mr.C.Prakasam For Respondents 1, 3 : Mr.P.Muthukumar, State Government Pleader For Respondent No.2 : Mr.K.Sathish Kumar

Page 1 of 4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

WP No.147 of 2020

ORDER

(Made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) We have heard Mr.C.Prakasam, learned counsel for the petitioner,

Mr.P.Muthukumar, learned State Government Pleader, appearing for respondents

1 and 3 and Mr.K.Sathish Kumar, learned counsel for the second respondent.

The petitioner seeks direction against the respondents not to open TASMAC liquor shop in Masinakudi Village. Similar writ petition, bearing No.16664 of 2020, was filed by the very same petitioner, and said writ petition was already disposed of under order dated 20.11.2020, recording the submission made by the District Manager, TASMAC, Ooty, that there was no proposal to open a TASMAC shop in Masinakudi village.

In light of that, nothing survives for consideration in this writ petition. The writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, WMP No.181 of 2020 is closed.

(S.V.G., CJ.) (D.B.C., J.) 02.01.2024

Index : Yes/No tar To

Page 2 of 4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

WP No.147 of 2020

1.The District Collector, The Nilgiris District, Ooty

2.The District Manager, TASMAC Ooty, The Nilgiris District

3.The Assistant Commissioner, Excise and Prohibition Department, Collectorate, Ooty, The Nilgiris District

Page 3 of 4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

WP No.147 of 2020

THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND

D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.

(tar)

WP No.147 of 2020

02.01.2024

Page 4 of 4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Sanjay V.Gangapurwala
D.Bharatha Chakravarthy

CNR

HCMA010017752020

Bench

D.bharatha Chakravarthy

Disposal

DISPOSED OF

Rakesh P Sheth Vs The Securities and Exchange Board of India

2 Jan 2024

Saravanan Vs The Commissioner

2 Jan 2024