Disposed

S.Perumal v. District Collector Office

Madras HC22 Mar 2024WP/1459/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition sought completion of an enquiry into alleged excess quarrying on the petitioner's patta land and disposal of his representation. Official respondents produced proceedings dated 12.03.2024 showing the representation was disposed and the enquiry concluded in the petitioner's favour. The court recorded that order and closed the writ petition.

What the court decided

AI extract

S.Perumal Vs District Collector Office — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.No.1459 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 22.03.2024

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH

W.P.No.1459 of 2024

S.Perumal

.. Petitioner

1.District Collector's Office, Tirupathur, Tirupathur District.

¶11

2.Taluk Level Task Force Committee, Natarampalli, Tirupathur District.

¶12

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tirupathur District.

¶13

4.The Assistant Director,

¶14

Geology and Mines District Collectorate Vellore, Vellore District.

¶15

5.The Block Development Officer, Office of the Block Development Officer, Natarampalli.

¶16

6.The Thasildar, Office of the Thasildar, Natarampalli.

¶17

7.Sathishkumar .. Respondents

¶18

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of mandamus directing 2^nd and 3^rd respondents to complete the enquiry as per the communication of

¶19

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶20

1/4

¶21

W.P.No.1459 of 2024

¶22

the 1^st respondent dated 14.12.2023 and to file a report with regard to the quantum of sand illegally in the petitioner patta land in Survey No.289/2C to an extent of 0.32 cents and further direct them dispose of the representation of the petitioner dated 06.12.2023.

¶23

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Rajasekar

¶24

For Respondents : Mr.E.Vijay Anand Additional Government Pleader for R1 to R4, R6 Mr.Anandan Government Advocate for R5

¶25

ORDER

¶26

The prayer of the petitioner is for a mandamus directing the Taluk Level Task Force Committee / R2 and the Revenue Divisional Officer / R3 to complete enquiry in regard to the allegations of excess quarrying in Survey No. 289/2C and to further direct them to dispose his representation dated 06.12.2023.

¶27

Mr.Vijay Anand, learned Additional Government Pleader, appearing for the official respondents circulates a copy of proceedings in RDO/TPT/284/2024-A1 dated 12.03.2024 to the effect that the representation has been disposed, enquiry caused as against R7 and the allegations of excess quarrying.

¶28

The result of the enquiry is in favour of the petitioner.

¶29

Hence, the purpose of this writ petition stands achieved and https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/4

¶30

W.P.No.1459 of 2024

¶31

recording order dated 12.03.2024, this writ petition is closed. No

¶32

costs.

¶33

22.03.2024

¶34

Index:Yes/No Neutral Citation:Yes ssm

¶35

¶36

1.The District Collector's Office, Tirupathur, Tirupathur District.

¶37

2.The Taluk Level Task Force Committee, Natarampalli, Tirupathur District.

¶38

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tirupathur District.

¶39

4.The Assistant Director, Geology and Mines District Collectorate Vellore, Vellore District.

¶40

5.The Block Development Officer, Office of the Block Development Officer, Natarampalli.

¶41

6.The Thasildar, Office of the Thasildar, Natarampalli.

¶42

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶43

3/4

¶44

W.P.No.1459 of 2024

DR. ANITA SUMANTH,J.

ssm

W.P.No.1459 of 2024

22.03.2024

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶50

4/4

S.Perumal v. District Collector Office

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

S.Perumal v. District Collector Office

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

F.Miraclin Vs the State of Tamil Nadu

M.Parvathy Vs the District Collector

Dr. C. Sujipreethi MD (General Medicine) Vs the State of Tamilnadu

G.R.D.College of Pharmacy Vs the Registrar

Dr.D.L.Sam Bennihin Vs the State of Tamil Nadu

Bakkiyameri Vs the Revenue Divisional Officer