Writ petitions sought quashing of refusal slips and registration of documents without original parent documents; counsel stated the beneficiary under the Will had died, so nothing survived. The court dismissed both petitions as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.Nos.1453 & 1456 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 11.06.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
WP.Nos.1453 & 1456 of 2022
K.Ramani @ Sellam ... Petitioner in W.P.No.1453 of 2022 K.Ramani @ Sellam ... Petitioner in W.P.No.1456 of 2022
Vs
The Joint Sub Registrar No.I, Office of the Sub Registrar, Tindivanam, Villupuram District. ... Respondent in both WPs
Common Prayer:- Writ Petitions filed, under the Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to impugned Refusal Slip R.F.L.Nos.1/22 & 2/22 respectively dated 11.01.2022 issued by the respondent and quash the same and consequently direct the respondent to register the documents without insisting for the production of original parent documents in light of the order made by this court in K.S.Vijayandran Vs IG of Registration 2011(2)LW 648 within the time stipulated by this court.
For Petitioner : Mr.V.T.Balaji
W.P.Nos.1453 & 1456 of 2022
in both WPs
For Respondent : Mr.Yogesh Kannadasan in both WPs Special Government Pleader
COMMON ORDER
These Writ Petitions have been filed to quash impugned Refusal Slip R.F.L.Nos.1/22 & 2/22 respectively dated 11.01.2022 issued by the respondent and consequently direct the respondent to register the documents without insisting for the production of original parent documents in light of the order made by this court in K.S.Vijayandran Vs IG of Registration 2011(2)LW 648 within the time stipulated by this court.
appearing for the petitioner submitted that subsequent to filing of the Writ Petition, the beneficiary under the Will has died and hence, nothing survives for adjudication in these Writ Petitions.
W.P.Nos.1453 & 1456 of 2022
respondent, these Writ Petitions are dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
11.06.2024
Index:Yes/No
Neutral Citation : Yes/No
vrc
To,
The Joint Sub Registrar No.I, Office of the Sub Registrar, Tindivanam, Villupuram District.
W.P.Nos.1453 & 1456 of 2022
N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.
vrc
WP.Nos.1453 & 1456 of 2022
11.06.2024
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
K.S.Vijayandran Vs IG of RegistrationReferred
K.S.Vijayandran Vs IG of Registration 2011(2)LW 648
K.Ramani @ Sellam
The Joint Sub Registrar No.I, Office of the Sub Registrar, Tindivanam, Villupuram District
N.Sathish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
