Disposed

T.K.Veera Ragavan v. The District Collector

Madras HC3 Jul 2024WP/13447/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court, through a Single Writ Bench, directed the Tahsildar (1st Respondent) to conduct a detailed enquiry with opportunity of hearing on the petitioner's representation regarding forged power deeds and sell notices within eight weeks, without adjudging the merits of the forgery claim.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the first respondent (Tahsildar) to consider the petitioner's representation dated 27.01.2020 by conducting a detailed enquiry with opportunity of personal hearing and pass appropriate or

T.K.Veera Ragavan Vs The District Collector — Landlord and Tenant | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.No.13447 of 2020

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 03.07.2024

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD

¶6

Writ Petition No.13447 of 2020

T.K.Veera Ragavan

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The District Collector, Thiruvallur,

¶11

Thiruvallur District – 602 024.

¶12

2.The Sub Collector and Arbitrator, Revenue Divisional Office, Thiruvallur,

¶13

Thiruvallur District – 602 024.

¶14

3.The District Revenue Officer and Additional District Judge, Thiruvallur,

¶15

Thiruvallur District – 602 001.

¶16

4.The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Avadi.

¶17

5.The Inspector General of Registration, 100, Santhome High Road, Mullima Nagar, Mandavelipakkam,

¶18

Raja Annamalai Puram, Chennai – 600 028.

¶19

6.The Sub-Registrar,

¶20

Page No.1 of 7

¶21

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.No.13447 of 2020

Avadi.

7.S.Kuppusamy Naidu

8.Anandhan

9.Gunasekaran

10.P.C.Shanthi … Respondents

¶28

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the fourth to sixth respondent to dispose of the representations dated 26.11.2019, 03.02.2020 and 27.01.2020 given by the petitioner.

¶29

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Sreedhar

¶30

For Respondents 1 to 4 : Mr.K.Suresh, Government Advocate

¶31

For Respondents 5 & 6 : Mr.P.Ananda Kumar, Government Advocate

¶32

O R D E R

¶33

The petitioner has filed this petition seeking direction to the fourth to

¶34

sixth respondent to dispose of the representations dated 26.11.2019, 03.02.2020 and 27.01.2020 given by the petitioner.

¶35

The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner and his brother

¶36

purchased certain properties in S.Nos.370/2A, 370/4, 370/7, 370/9B and

¶37

Page No.2 of 7

¶38

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶39

W.P.No.13447 of 2020

¶40

370/11A and further executed a power deed in favour of one Swaminathan, Managing Partner of N.S.K. Motor & General finance for the S.Nos.370/2A, 370/9A, 371/11A, 370/9B 371/7A2 along with the respondents 7 to 10. When the previous power document was in force, the respondents 7 to 10 have created a forged and false documents and executed two power deeds in favour of G.R.Babu and M.Balaji for the plot Nos.91, 92, 93, 104, 105, 52 and 53 and the power of attorney sold the plots to other purchasers. Thus, the petitioner has sent notice to the respondents 7 to 10 to cancel the forged documents, however, no steps were taken to cancel the documents. Hence, the petitioner has made a representation before the respondents 1 to 4 dated 26.11.2019 and 27.01.2020 to take action against the respondents 7 to 10, but, the same was not considered. Aggrieved over the same, the petitioner has come forward with the present writ petition.

¶41

Though very many grounds have been raised in this writ petition, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that it would suffice, if this Court issues direction to the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 27.01.2020, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

¶42

Page No.3 of 7

¶43

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶44

W.P.No.13447 of 2020

¶45

Learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents has no objection for the said order being passed by this Court.

¶46

Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record.

¶47

Considering the limited prayer sought for by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court without going into the merits of the case, directs the first respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 27.01.2020 by conducting a detailed enquiry after giving due notice to both the parties, affording an opportunity of personal hearing, to consider the relevant documents submitted by both the parties at the time of the enquiry in regard to the subject matter property and pass appropriate orders on merits, in accordance with law and by following/observing the above principles of natural justice, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶48

This Writ Petition is disposed of with the aforesaid observation and directions. No costs.

¶49

03.07.2024

¶50

Page No.4 of 7

¶51

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶52

W.P.No.13447 of 2020

¶53

¶54

Index : Yes/No Speaking Order : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No

¶55

To:

¶56

1.The District Collector, Thiruvallur, Thiruvallur District – 602 024.

¶57

2.The Sub Collector and Arbitrator, Revenue Divisional Office, Thiruvallur, Thiruvallur District – 602 024.

¶58

3.The District Revenue Officer and Additional District Judge, Thiruvallur, Thiruvallur District – 602 001.

¶59

4.The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Avadi.

¶60

5.The Inspector General of Registration, 100, Santhome High Road, Mullima Nagar, Mandavelipakkam, Raja Annamalai Puram, Chennai – 600 028.

¶61

6.The Sub-Registrar, Avadi.

¶62

Page No.5 of 7

¶63

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶64

W.P.No.13447 of 2020

¶65

J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD,J.

¶66

¶67

W.P.No.13447 of 2020

¶68

Page No.6 of 7

¶69

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.No.13447 of 2020

03.07.2024

Page No.7 of 7

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

T.K.Veera Ragavan v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

T.K.Veera Ragavan v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s. Cheran Co-opertive Housing Building Society, Vs The Deputy Registrar of Co-Operative Societies (Housing)

P.Kanagaraj, Vs The District Collector

D.Shantha, Vs The Commissioner

K.Kathirvel, Vs The Deputy Superintendent of Police

The South India Assemblies of God Vs The Assistant Survey and Settlement Officer

Mr.S.Vinod, Vs The Collector