Writ petition challenging the constitutional validity of Section 70 of the TNVAT Act and Rule 15(17) of the TNVAT Rules was dismissed after the petitioner did not press the relief and made an endorsement to that effect.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.No.12632 of 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 21.10.2024
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G. ARUL MURUGAN
W.P.No.12632 of 2013
Poly Pipes India Pvt. Ltd., Represented by its Director, Mr.Vinay Hirawat, No.21, EVK Sampath Street, Lakshmi Nivas Vepery, Chennai-600 007.
.. Petitioner
vs
Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of Declaration, declaring the provisions of Section 70 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 and Rule 15(17) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Rules, 2007 as unconstitutional and ultra vires Entry 54 of List II to the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution of India apart from being violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(g), Article 265, Article 301 and not saved by Presidential assent under Article 304(b) of the Constitution of India, or pass such further or other orders as may be deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and render justice.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.A.Parthasarathy for Mr.N.Inbarajan
For Respondents : Mrs.K.Vasanthamala Government Advocate
1/2
W.P.No.12632 of 2013
DR. ANITA SUMANTH.,J. and G. ARUL MURUGAN.,J.
ORDER (Order of the Court was made by Dr. ANITA SUMANTH.,J)
Mr.Parthasarathy, learned counsel, states that the petitioner does not press the relief sought for in W.P.No.12632 of 2013 being a declaration to the effect that Section 70 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 and Rule 15 (17) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Rules, 2007 are unconstitutional and ultra vires Entry 54 of List II to the Seventh Schedule and violative of several provisions of the Constitution of India. He makes an endorsement to this effect, recording which, this writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. No costs.
Index:Yes/No Neutral Citation:Yes ssm
W.P.No.12632 of 2013
(2/2)
2/2
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Poly Pipes India Pvt. Ltd., represented by its Director, Mr.Vinay Hirawat
The Assistant Commissioner (CT) Main Vepery Assessment Circle No.3
The State of Tamil Nadu represented by its Secretary to Government, Commercial Taxes and Registration (B2) Department
Anita Sumanth
G. Arul Murugan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
