Disposed

T.Dheenadayalan, v. the Commissioner of Police

Madras HC18 Oct 2024WP/12576/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court reviewed a status report indicating that the investigation against the police officers was proceeding on the right direction in a fair and free manner. Finding satisfaction with the report, the Court closed the Writ Petition and connected miscellaneous petition.

What did the court decide?

Writ Petition closed with no order as to costs. Connected petition also closed.

T.Dheenadayalan, Vs the Commissioner of… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P. No. 12576 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 18.10.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN

¶6

W.P. No.12576 of 2024

and

WMP.No.13735 of 2024

T.Dheenadayalan

... Petitioner

Vs.

1. The Commissioner of Police, Officer of the Commissioner of Police, Vepery, Chennai-600 007.

¶13

2. The Joint Commissioner of Police,

¶14

4 th Floor, V-3, Thirumangalam Police Station Complex Chennai-600 040.

¶15

3. The Deputy Commissioner of Police, O/o.Deputy Commissioner of Police,

¶16

6 th Avenue, P Block,

¶17

Anna Nagar, Chennai 600 040. ... Respondents

¶18

PRAYER : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 to take appropriate action against the Inspector of Police Mr.Kirubanidhi and the Sub Inspector of Police Mr. I.Murugan of K-3, Aminjikarai Police Station, Chennai under Section 166 of IPC 1860 by taking the complaint of the petitioner dated 08.02.2024 on file which was sent to the respondents on 09.02.2024 and consequently direct them to

¶19

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶20

1/4

¶21

W.P. No. 12576 of 2024

¶22

compensate the petitioner and his family members for the unexpected loss incurred due to their inaction.

¶23

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Vijay Anand

¶24

For Respondents : Mr.K.M.D.Muhilan, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

¶25

ORDER

¶26

Status report filed by the Assistant Commissioner of Police, Anna

¶27

Nagar Range, West Zone, Chennai indicating the actions taken on the complaint given by the petitioner herein.

¶28

The detailed report indicates that the police is proceeding on the

¶29

right direction by collecting evidence and recording statement and witnesses and the Assistant Commissioner of Police also ensured in the Status Report that after change of Investigating Officer, investigation is conducted in a fair and free manner with utmost impartiality ensuring that all the parties involved and treated fairly and justly.

¶30

This Court is satisfied that after change of Investigating Officer,

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶32

2/4

¶33

W.P. No. 12576 of 2024

¶34

the complaint of the petitioner has been monitored by the Assistant Commissioner of Police. The investigation has been conducted in a free and fair manner.

¶35

Recording the status report filed by the Assistant Commissioner

¶36

of Police, Writ Petition is closed. No order as to costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

18.10.2024

1. The Commissioner of Police, Officer of the Commissioner of Police, Vepery, Chennai-600 007.

¶41

2. The Joint Commissioner of Police, 4 th Floor,

¶42

V-3, Thirumangalam Police Station Complex Chennai-600 040.

¶43

3. The Deputy Commissioner of Police, O/o.Deputy Commissioner of Police, 6 th Avenue, P Block, Anna Nagar, Chennai 600 040.

¶44

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶45

3/4

¶46

W.P. No. 12576 of 2024

¶47

Dr.G.JAYACHANDRAN,J.

¶48

¶49

W.P.No.12576 of 2024

¶50

18.10.2024

¶51

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶52

4/4

T.Dheenadayalan, v. the Commissioner of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

T.Dheenadayalan, v. the Commissioner of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Aravind Subramaniyan Vs the State Rep by

M/S. Chettinad Cement Corporation Pvt. Ltd. Vs the Tamilnadu Pollution Control Board Rep by

Vetrivel Vs the State Rep by

S.M.Sugumar Vs the Inspector of Police

R.Geetha Vs Balepandian

M.Kandasamy Vs the Deputy Superintendent Police