before the first Appellate Authority and the same was dismissed. Once again, aggrieved by the same, the second respondent filed an appeal before the first respondent on 13.09.2022. After issuance of notice, the first respondent passed an order, by an order dated 14.08.2023, thereby directed the petitioner to furnish the information sought for by the second respondent, failing which, the petitioner will be imposed compensation of Rs.25,000/- as contemplated under Section 19(8)(b) of the RTI Act. On receipt of the said order, by a letter dated 09.10.2023, it was provided that the entities with GST registration certificate engaged in the business of manufacture and sale of granite stones, granite slabs, M-sand and fencing stone, whose registration were cancelled in the past five years. Thereby, the petitioner had complied with the order passed by the first respondent. However, the second respondent once again filed an application before the first respondent alleging that the information sought for by the petitioner was not provided as directed by the first respondent. On receipt of the same, the first respondent issued a show https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page 3 of 15