Disposed

K.Krishnan v. The District Collector

Madras HC1 Jul 2024WP/12520/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Landowner sought a direction to deposit balance interest at 15% per annum on enhanced compensation for land acquired under the Ambattur Neighbourhood scheme, as decreed by the Supreme Court. The Court directed respondents to deposit the balance interest within eight weeks.

What did the court decide?

Respondents directed to deposit the balance interest amount to the credit of LAOP.No.26 of 1982 before the Sub Court, Chengalpet within eight weeks.

K.Krishnan Vs The District Collector — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

WP.No.12520 of 2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 01.07.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR

¶6

W.P.No.12520 of 2023

K.Krishnan

.. Petitioner

Versus

The District Collector, Tiruvallur District, Tiruvallur.

¶11

The Member Secretary, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, Egmore, Chennai – 600 008.

¶12

The Special Tahsildar, Land Acquisition, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, Egmore, Chennai – 600 008. .. Respondents

¶13

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents herein to deposit the balance interest amount to the credit of LAOP No.26 of 1982 on the file of Sub Court Chengalpattu pursuant to the Judgment and Decree of this Honourable Court dated 01.8.1989 made in Cross Objection in A.S. No.536 of 1984 and as per Judgment of the Honourable Supreme Court of India New Delhi dated 23.09.1996 made in Civil Appeal No.12607 of 1996 by fixing a time limit.

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

1/5

¶16

WP.No.12520 of 2023

¶17

For Petitioner : Mr.M.S.Subramanian For Respondents : Mr.S.J.Mohamed Sathik Government Advocate – R1 & R3 Ms.P.Veena Suresh – R2

¶18

ORDER

¶19

This writ petition is filed to direct the respondents herein to deposit the balance interest amount to the credit of LAOP No.26 of 1982 on the file of Sub Court Chengalpet pursuant to the Judgment and Decree of this Court dated 01.8.1989 made in Cross Objection in A.S. No.536 of 1984 and as per Judgment of the Honourable Supreme Court dated 23.09.1996 made in Civil Appeal No.12607 of 1996 by fixing a time limit.

¶20

Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate appearing for the first and third respondents and the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the second respondent and perused the materials available on record.

¶21

It is the case of the petitioner that the land of the petitioner has been

¶22

acquired for the purpose of Ambattur Neighbourhood scheme on 12.11.1975 and the award was passed on 13.03.1981. Subsequently, reference was made

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

2/5

¶25

WP.No.12520 of 2023

¶26

under section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act and thereafter, the matter went up to the Supreme Court and the Apex Court by a Decree and Judgment dated 01.08.1989 in Civil Appeal No.12607 of 1996 has granted interest at the rate of 15% p.a. on the enhanced amount from the date of delivery of possession till the date of deposit of the enhanced compensation. Since, the amount has not been deposited, Execution Petition has been filed. The grievance of the petitioner is that the balance interest amount as awarded by the Apex Court has not been disbursed to the petitioner. Hence, the present Writ Petition.

¶27

A perusal of the judgment of the Apex Court makes it clear that in fact the State has undertaken to pay 15% interest on the enhanced compensation amount from the date of delivery of possession till the date of deposit of the enhanced compensation. It is the contention of the petitioner that the balance interest amount has not been deposited by the respondents till date.

¶28

Considering the facts and circumstances, the respondents are directed to deposit the balance interest amount to the credit of LAOP.No.26 of 1982 on the file of the Sub Court, Chengalpet within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order.

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

3/5

¶31

WP.No.12520 of 2023

¶32

With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶33

01.07.2024

¶34

vrc

¶35

Index :Yes/No Internet :Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No

¶36

To,

¶37

The District Collector, Tiruvallur District, Tiruvallur.

¶38

The Member Secretary, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, Egmore, Chennai – 600 008.

¶39

The Special Tahsildar, Land Acquisition, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, Egmore, Chennai – 600 008.

¶40

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶41

4/5

¶42

WP.No.12520 of 2023

¶43

N. SATHISH KUMAR, J.

¶44

vrc

¶45

W.P.No.12520 of 2023

¶46

01.07.2024

¶47

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶48

5/5

K.Krishnan v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Krishnan v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Babuji alias Babu Vs J.Saravana Kannan and another

E.Anbu Vs the District Collector

P.S.Ramu @ T.P.S. Raam Vs the District Collector

N.Nasreen Begum Vs the District Collectdor

M/S.Umar Pulavar Nagar Pallivasal Vs Inspector General of Registration

P.P.Raja Vs the Sub Registrar