Dismissed

R.Nirmala, v. the District Collector

Madras HC8 Jan 2024WP/12353/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition filed by R.Nirmala seeking quashing of a specific order regarding salary stoppage. The High Court held that as the petitioner died prior to the pronouncement of the order, the matter became infructuous and dismissed the petition.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous due to the death of the petitioner; no costs awarded; connected miscellaneous petitions closed.

R.Nirmala, Vs the District Collector — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.No.12353 of 2012

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 08.01.2024

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD

¶6

Writ Petition No.12353 of 2012 and M.P.Nos.1 to 3 of 2012

R.Nirmala

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The District Collector, Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri.

¶11

2.The Block Development Officer, Kaveripattinam Union, Kaveripattinam, Krishnagiri District.

¶12

3.The Chairman, Kaveripattinam Panchayat Union, Kaveripattinam, Krishnagiri. … Respondents

¶13

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the second respondent in Pro.Na.Ka.No.2913/2009/A6 dated 21.01.2012 quash the same in so far as it relates to the petitioner and issue consequential directions to the respondents to continue to disburse salary to the petitioner

¶14

Page No.1 of 5

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

W.P.No.12353 of 2012

¶17

regularly every month for the services rendered by her to regularize her services.

¶18

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Thamarai Selvan

¶19

For Respondents 1 & 2 : M/s.P.Vijayadevi, Government Advocate

¶20

For Respondent 3 : Mr.K.Surendran

¶21

O R D E R

¶22

The relief sought by the petitioner in this writ petition is to call for the records of the second respondent in Pro.Na.Ka.No.2913/2009/A6 dated 21.01.2012 quash the same in so far as it relates to the petitioner and issue consequential directions to the respondents to continue to disburse salary to the petitioner regularly every month for the services rendered by her to regularize her services.

¶23

Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that this writ petition is related to stoppage of salary, however, the writ petitioner died on 15.10.2021. Hence, the matter has become infructuous and nothing survives in this writ petition for further

¶24

Page No.2 of 5

¶25

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶26

W.P.No.12353 of 2012

¶27

adjudication. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the case bundle.

¶28

Considering the submission coupled with an endorsement made by

¶29

the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are

¶30

closed.

¶31

08.01.2024

¶32

vm Index : Yes/No Speaking Order : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No

¶33

To:

¶34

1.The District Collector, Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri.

¶35

2.The Block Development Officer, Kaveripattinam Union, Kaveripattinam, Krishnagiri District.

¶36

Page No.3 of 5

¶37

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶38

W.P.No.12353 of 2012

¶39

3.The Chairman, Kaveripattinam Panchayat Union, Kaveripattinam, Krishnagiri.

¶40

J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD,J.

¶41

¶42

W.P.No.12353 of 2012

¶43

Page No.4 of 5

¶44

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.No.12353 of 2012

08.01.2024

Page No.5 of 5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

R.Nirmala, v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.Nirmala, v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.Shivalakshmi Vs S.Swarna I.A.S and Another

H.M.Shahul Hameed Vs the Superintendent of Police

R.Venkatachalapathi, Vs the Director of School

V.Gowthaman, Vs Tamil Nadu State Transport

T.G.Rajendran, Vs the State of Tamil Nadu

V.Ramarathinam Vs the Circle Head