Disposed

T.Gunasekar v. The Managing Director

Madras HC13 Mar 2024WP/12264/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition challenging a 2014 suspension order pending disciplinary proceedings. By then the disciplinary enquiry had concluded and the petitioner was dismissed from service on 19.03.2021. The court held nothing survived and the petition had become infructuous, granting liberty to pursue remedies on subsistence allowance.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as infructuous; liberty granted to seek legal remedies over unpaid subsistence allowance; miscellaneous petitions closed, no costs.

T.Gunasekar Vs The Managing Director — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.No. 12264 of 2018

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 13.03.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND

¶6

W.P.No. 12264 of 2018 and W.M.P.Nos. 14327 & 14332 of 2018 and 23852 of 2020

¶7

T. Gunasekar ... Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Apex Co operative Federation Ltd., No.571, Anna Salai, 4^th Floor, Nandanam, Chennai – 600 035. ... Respondent

¶10

Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records made in impugned order Che.Mu.No.348/C/2014 dated 12.03.2014 on the file of respondent herein and quash the same as illegal and direct the respondent to reinstate the petitioner into services forthwith.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr. R. Sankarasubbu For Respondent : Mr. A. Rajaperumal for Mr. L.P. Shanmuga Sundaram

¶12

O R D E R

¶13

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel

¶14

for the respondent.

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

1/4

¶17

W.P.No. 12264 of 2018

¶18

2. This Writ Petition has been filed against the order dated 12.03.2014 passed

¶19

by the respondent wherein, the petitioner was suspended from service and also the petitioner sought consequential direction to reinstate him into service. Admittedly, there is no stay granted by this Court in this case.

¶20

3. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondent. Based on the averments in the counter affidavit, the learned Standing Counsel submits that the disciplinary enquiry was concluded and the petitioner was dismissed from service vide proceedings dated 19.03.2021. It is also stated in the counter affidavit that the subsistence allowance also paid to the petitioner from 12.03.2014 to till the date of dismissal order.

¶21

4. In view of the fact that this writ petition has been filed against the suspension order pending disciplinary proceedings and as of now, disciplinary proceedings are concluded and final order was passed on 19.03.2021 by the respondent dismissing the petitioner from the service, in the considered opinion of this Court, nothing survives in this writ petition for adjudication.

¶22

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶23

2/4

¶24

W.P.No. 12264 of 2018

¶25

5. Accordingly, this Writ Petition has become infructuous.

¶26

6. However, though there is specific averment in the counter affidavit filed by the respondent that the petitioner was paid subsistence allowance from the date of his suspension to till the date of dismissal, the learned counsel for the petitioner disputing the same and sought permission of the Court to ventilate his grievances on that aspect.

¶27

7. Accordingly, liberty is granted to the petitioner to avail his legal remedies if subsistence allowance is not paid to him, as stated by the respondent in their counter.

¶28

8. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. No costs.

¶29

13.03.2024

¶30

Index :Yes/No Neutral Citation :Yes/No

¶31

¶32

To The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Apex Co operative Federation Ltd., No.571, Anna Salai, 4^th Floor, Nandanam, Chennai – 600 035.

¶33

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶34

3/4

¶35

W.P.No. 12264 of 2018

¶36

BATTU DEVANAND, J.

¶37

¶38

W.P.No. 12264 of 2018 and W.M.P.Nos. 14327 & 14332 of 2018 and 23852 of 2020

¶39

13.03.2024

¶40

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶41

4/4

T.Gunasekar v. The Managing Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

T.Gunasekar v. The Managing Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Murugaveni,W/o.Pazhanivel(Late Vs The State Rep by The Principal

T.Sudalaimuthu, Vs The Director of Elementary

S.Duraisamy Vs The District Collector

C.Mercy Gloria, Vs The Director of School

J.Johnson Devakumar Jacob, Vs The Chairman

K.Shanmugakani, Vs State of Tamil Nadu