Disposed

N.Amudha v. The Registrar General

Madras HC1 Mar 2024WP/11761/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition challenging a Principal District Judge's disciplinary order; counsel conceded the appellate remedy had not been exhausted. The court disposed of the writ petition granting liberty to file an appeal within four weeks and closed the connected miscellaneous petition.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to prefer appeal within four weeks from receipt of copy of this order; miscellaneous petition closed; no costs.

N.Amudha Vs The Registrar General — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.No.11761 of 2021

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 01.03.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM and

¶6

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR

¶7

W.P.No.11761 of 2021

¶8

and

¶9

W.M.P.No.12525 of 2021

N.Amudha

... Petitioner

Vs.

The Registrar General, High Court, Madras – 600 104.

¶14

The Principal District Judge, Villupuram. ... Respondents

¶15

Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to the order dated 07.04.2021 in Application No.288 of 2014 of the respondent herein (Principal District Judge, Villupuram) (Disciplinary Authority) and quash the same.

¶16

For Petitioner : Mrs.A.L.Ganthimathi, Senior Counsel for Mr.A.R.Karthik Lakshmanan

¶17

Page 1 of 4

¶18

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶19

W.P.No.11761 of 2021

¶20

For Respondents : Mr.B.Vijay

¶21

O R D E R

¶22

(Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. )

¶23

The proceedings of the Principal District Judge, Villupuram dated

¶24

07.04.2021 is under challenge in the present writ proceedings.

¶25

The learned Senior Counsel, Mrs.A.L.Ganthimathi appearing on behalf of the petitioner would submit that the writ petitioner has not exhausted the appellate remedy, as contemplated under the Rules. Since, the petitioner has chosen to prefer an appeal challenging the said order, the Writ Petition stands disposed of by granting liberty to the writ petitioner to prefer an appeal within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶26

Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. Consequently,

¶27

the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No costs.

¶28

(S.M.S.,J.) (K.R.S.,J.) 01.03.2024

¶29

skr Index : Yes

¶30

Page 2 of 4

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶32

W.P.No.11761 of 2021

¶33

¶34

The Registrar General, High Court, Madras – 600 104.

¶35

The Principal District Judge, Villupuram.

¶36

Page 3 of 4

¶37

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶38

W.P.No.11761 of 2021

¶39

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. and K.RAJASEKAR, J.

¶40

skr

¶41

W.P.No.11761 of 2021

¶42

01.03.2024

¶43

Page 4 of 4

¶44

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

N.Amudha v. The Registrar General

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

N.Amudha v. The Registrar General

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.Gopalsamy, Vs the Government of Tamil Nadu

C.Rajalakshmi Vs the Secretary

C.Rajalakshmi Vs the Secretary

P.Alagu Vs the State of Tamilndu

S.Padmanabhan Vs the Principal Secretary

G.Nagaraj Vs The Registrar General