Disposed
Raman v. the Commissioner
Madras HCWP/11667/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Writ petition filed seeking mandamus to control a temple. Court recorded opposition to direct departmental control and disposed of the petition with no order as to costs.
What did the court decide?
null
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
W.P.No.11667 of 2024
¶2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
¶3
DATED: 03.06.2024
¶4
CORAM :
¶5
THE HON'BLE MR.R.MAHADEVAN, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE AND
¶6
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ
¶7
W.P.No.11667 of 2024
¶8
Raman
¶9
.. Petitioner
¶10
Vs
¶11
- 1.The Commissioner,
¶12
- Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, No.119, Uthamar Gandhi Salai, Nungambakkam, Chennai-600 034.
¶13
- 2.The District Collector, Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Raman
- respondent
The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department
- respondent
The District Collector, Krishnagiri District
- respondent
The Superintendent of Police, Krishnagiri District
- respondent
The Thasildhar, Krishnagiri District
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court