Allowed

Vanathu Chinnapan v. the Government of Tamil Nadu

Madras HC24 Apr 2024WP/11213/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Computer Instructor Grade-I challenged audit objection and recovery of excess salary. Counsel agreed the matter was covered by this Court's common order dated 08.03.2024 in W.P.Nos.27205 of 2023 etc.; writ petition allowed on those terms.

What did the court decide?

Recovery orders quashed; petitioner entitled to Computer Instructor Grade-I pay scale; arrears to be paid within eight weeks; no costs.

Vanathu Chinnapan Vs the Government of Tamil… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.No.11213 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 24.04.2024

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY

¶6

W.P.No.11213 of 2024 and

¶7

W.M.P.Nos.12303 & 12304 of 2024

Vanathu Chinnappan

...Petitioner

-Vs-

1.The Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary, School Education Department, Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009.

¶12

2.The Director of Schools, School Education Department, Chennai – 600 006.

¶13

3.The Joint Director (Vocational) Education, School Education Department, Chennai – 600 006.

¶14

4.The Chief Accounts Officer, Commissionerate of School Education, Chennai – 600 006.

¶15

5.The Headmaster, Government Higher Secondary School, Medavakkam – 600 100.

¶16

...Respondents

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

1/5

¶19

W.P.No.11213 of 2024

¶20

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a direction in the nature of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the Audit Objection of the 4^th respondent in his proceedings in Na.Ka.No.53130/AKD/2023 dated 25.08.2023 and the 5^th respondent passed a consequential order in Na.Ka.No.120/2024 dated 19.02.2023 and quash the same and direct the respondents to continuously pay the petitioner 3% annual increment in their salary in the post as Computer Instructor Grade-I and pass such further orders.

¶21

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Mahalakshmi

¶22

For R1 to R3 & R5 : Mr.V.Manoharan Additional Government Pleader

¶23

O R D E R

¶24

When the matter came up for hearing, both sides learned counsels are

¶25

at idem that the subject matter in the present petition is covered by the common order of this Court in W.P.Nos.27205 of 2023 etc., dated 08.03.2024.

¶26

The operative portion of the said common order is extracted hereunder:

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

2/5

¶29

W.P.No.11213 of 2024

¶30

“9.Therefore, the petitioners are not entitled for pay sale equivalent to P.G. Assistant and they are entitled for the pay scale in the cadre of Computer Instructor Grade-I. However, the excess amount which was already paid to the petitioners cannot be recovered, since it was not paid due to their representation or due to their fault.

¶31

10. In view of the above discussions, it cannot be said that the order passed by the Chief Accounts Officer, Chennai, finds with any infirmity. However, the orders passed by the Headmaster of the respective schools, insofar as the recovery of excess salary, cannot be sustained and it is liable to be quashed. Accordingly, the orders passed by the Headmaster of the respective schools, dated 24.08.2023, 25.08.2023, 23.08.2023, 19.07.2023, 21.08.2023, 09.06.2023, 29.05.2023, 14.09.2023, 13.09.2023, 21.09.2023, 07.11.2023, 04.11.2023 are hereby quashed. The respondents are directed to fix the scale of pay to the petitioners in the cadre of Computer Instructor Grade-I in the pay scale of Rs.9,300-34,800+Grade Pay Rs.4,800 and pay the salary accordingly to the petitioners and arrears if any, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order.”

¶32

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶33

3/5

¶34

W.P.No.11213 of 2024

¶35

D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.,

¶36

In view thereof, the present writ petition is allowed on the aforesaid

¶37

terms. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶38

24.04.2024

¶39

cda Index : Yes Speaking Order

¶40

¶41

1.The Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu, School Education Department, Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009.

¶42

2.The Director of Schools, School Education Department, Chennai – 600 006.

¶43

3.The Joint Director (Vocational) Education, School Education Department, Chennai – 600 006.

¶44

4.The Chief Accounts Officer, Commissionerate of School Education, Chennai – 600 006.

¶45

5.The Headmaster, Government Higher Secondary School, Medavakkam – 600 100.

¶46

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶47

4/5

¶48

W.P.No.11213 of 2024

¶49

W.P.No.11213 of 2024

¶50

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶51

5/5

Vanathu Chinnapan v. the Government of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vanathu Chinnapan v. the Government of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Gopi Vs Tamil Nadu Civil Supplies Corporation

T.Meena, Vs the Government of Tamilnadu

P.Rajalakshmi, Vs the Director of Indian Medicine

S.Ramakrishnan Vs The commissioner

P.Shanmugam Vs the Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation Ltd.

G.Vadivel Vs the Managing Director