Writ petition seeking a mandamus to the State Human Rights Commission to take the petitioner's complaint on file was dismissed for default after the petitioner failed to appear despite the matter being listed under 'FOR DISMISSAL'.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.No.10552 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 11.12.2024
Coram
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR
and
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR
W.P.No.10552 of 2021
S.Shobana
D/o.Shanmugam
.. Petitioner
vs
State Human Rights Commission No.143, P.S.Kumarasamy Raja Salai Greenways Road, Raja Annamalaipuram Chennai – 600 028
Inspector of Police Thirupathur Town Police Station Thirupathur, Thirupathur District
Sub-Inspector of Police Thirupathur Town Police Station
Page 1 of 6
W.P.No.10552 of 2021
Thirupathur, Thirupathur District
Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying
for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the first respondent herein
to take the petitioner complaint dated 02.04.2021 on file and number the
same and issue summons to the respondents 2 and 3 herein.
For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondents : Mr.J.Chandran Sundar Sashikumar for R1
O R D E R
(Order of the Court was made by M.SUNDAR, J.)
Read this in conjunction with and in continuation of earlier
proceedings made in the previous listing on 10.12.2024, which reads as
follows:
Page 2 of 6
W.P.No.10552 of 2021
M.SUNDAR, J., and
K.RAJASEKAR, J.,
[Order of the Court was made by M.SUNDAR. J.,]
Mr.J.Baranidharan, learned counsel for SHRC is before
this Court but there is no representation for writ petitioner either in the physical Court or on 'Videoconferencing' {'VC'} platform. To be noted, this is a hybrid hearing, which is a daily / routine / regular feature in this Court.
2. With the intention of giving an opportunity to writ petitioner and learned counsel for writ petitioner, list this matter tomorrow but under the cause list caption 'FOR DISMISSAL'.
List on 11.12.2024.'
'FOR DISMISSAL' but the position is no different. In other words, there is no representation for the writ petitioner today also. However,
Mr.J.Chandran Sundar Sashikumar, learned counsel representing the
counsel on record for R1 (SHRC) is before us. As regards, counsel on
record for R1 (SHRC), Registry is directed to not to show the name of Page 3 of 6
W.P.No.10552 of 2021
Thiru.R.Srinivas henceforth as learned counsel has since been designated
as a Senior Advocate by this Court.
has become infractuous and worked itself out as orders have since been
passed by SHRC but we refrain from going into that as the writ petitioner
has not chosen to come before this Court in spite of the matter being
listed under the cause list caption 'FOR DISMISSAL'.
Captioned writ petition is dismissed for default / for not being
pursued. There shall be no order as to costs.
[M.S., J] [K.R.S., J] 11.12.2024
Index: Yes/No
Neutral Citation: Yes/No Speaking order / Non-speaking order gpa
Page 4 of 6
W.P.No.10552 of 2021
To
The Registrar State Human Rights Commission No.143, P.S.Kumarasamy Raja Salai Greenways Road, Raja Annamalaipuram Chennai – 600 028
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page 5 of 6
W.P.No.10552 of 2021
M.SUNDAR,J., and K.RAJASEKAR, J.,
gpa
W.P.No.10552 of 2021
11.12.2024
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page 6 of 6
1 provisions across 1 enactments
S.Shobana
The Registrar, State Human Rights Commission
Mrs. Baby, Inspector of Police
Mr.Murugan, Sub-Inspector of Police
Mr.Dinesh Kumar S/o.Murugesan (suo motu impleaded)
M.SUNDAR
K.RAJASEKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
