Disposed
M/S Vee Ess Enterprises v. the Director General of
Madras HCWP/10254/2011
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Writ petition challenging a foreign trade notification of 2005 as ultra vires and violative of Articles 21 and 301. The petitioner did not press the challenge and undertook to appear before the adjudicating authority. The court permitted the petitioner to raise contentions in the pending adjudication and disposed of the petition without costs.
What did the court decide?
Liberty to appear before the adjudicating authority and raise contentions there; writ petition disposed of, no costs, MPs closed.