Disposed

M/S. A.K. Imports and Exports v. the Commissioner of Customs

Madras HC18 Apr 2024WP/10190/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition seeking release of 121 imported second-hand digital multifunction print, copy and scan machines detained by customs. Both sides agreed to disposal in line with an earlier batch of writ petitions. The court directed disposal on those terms: provisional release on payment of enhanced duty as quantified by customs, without affecting further adjudication.

What the court decided

AI extract

M/S. A.K. Imports and Exports Vs the Commissioner of Customs — Customs and Excise | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.P.No.10190 of 2024

¶2

THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 18.04.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

¶6

W.P.No.10190 of 2024 and W.M.P.No.11243 of 2024

¶7

M/s.A.K.Imports & Exports H.No.5-9-250/258 Room No.20 3rd Floor, Unity House, Abids Hyderabad 500 001 Represented by its Managing Partner Mr.Laxminarayanan

¶8

... Petitioner

¶9

¶10

The Commissioner of Customs Chennai II Import Commissionerate Customs House, No.60, Rajaji Salai, Chennai-600 001.

¶11

The Additional Commissioner of Customs (Gr.5), Chennai II Import Commissionerate Custom House, No.60, Rajaji Salai, Chennai-600 001.

¶12

The Deputy Commissioner of Customs, (Gr.5), Custom House, No.60, Rajaji Salai, Chennai-600 001. ... Respondents

¶13

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶14

1/6

¶15

W.P.No.10190 of 2024

¶16

PRAYER : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing Respondents 1 – 3 herein forthwith release the various models of Secondhand Highly Specialized Equipment namely used Digital Multifunction Print, Copying & Scanning Machines, numbering 121 units imported by the Petitioner under Bill of Entry No.2479513 dated 08.03.2024 on assessment and collection of the applicable customs duties leviable on the said goods by computing the said duties on the enhanced value, as appraised by the DGFT approved Chartered Engineers M/s.SVIA Consultant Services LLP in their report Certificate No. SVIA/IND/CHE/2024/095 dated 20.03.2024.

¶17

For Petitioner : Mr.N.Viswanathan

¶18

For Respondents: Mr.G.Meganathan, Jr. SC

¶19

¶20

ORDER

¶21

This writ petition pertains to the import of second hand digital multifunction printing and copying machines.

¶22

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶23

2/6

¶24

W.P.No.10190 of 2024

¶25

Both learned counsel for the petitioner and learned junior standing counsel for the Customs Department submit that a batch of writ petitions pertaining to the same product were disposed of by order dated 23.11.2023 in W.P.Nos.29673 of 2023 batch. They further submit that this writ petition may also be disposed of on the same terms.

¶26

The operative portion of the order of this Court in the above

¶27

mentioned batch is as under:

¶28

“(i) W.P.Nos.28817 and 30506 of 2023 are disposed of directing the petitioners to cause reply to the show cause notice issued to them and the respondent department is directed to consider the same and pass necessary orders within a stipulated time. As far as release of goods is concerned, the same shall be released provisionally.

¶29

(ii) W.P.Nos.29673, 27544, 27547, 27548, 28115, 28119, 29678, 29680, 29684 of 2023 & 30490, 30492, 30495, 30496, 30498, 30500, 30501 & 30503 of 2023 are allowed and the following order is passed:

¶30

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶31

(a) That there shall be a direction to the respondents to consider the plea of the petitioners to release the goods by

¶32

3/6

¶33

W.P.No.10190 of 2024

¶34

way of provisional release on condition that, the petitioner shall pay/deposit the enhanced duty amount. On receipt of such enhanced duty amount paid by the petitioners, the goods in question shall be released within a period of three (3) weeks thereafter.

¶35

(b) For payment of such duty, quantification shall be made by the Customs forthwith within one (1) week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On receipt of such quantification, the payment shall be immediately made by the petitioners and on receipt of the payment in entirety, the goods shall be released as indicated above at the outer limit of three (3) weeks.

¶36

(c) It is made clear that this order will not stand in the way for Customs Department to go ahead with the further proceedings including the adjudication in the manner known to law.

¶37

(d) It is further made clear that in the earlier interim order passed in a related writ petitions by an another Division Bench of this Court, that demurrage charges till date for the goods was directed to be considered for waiver. In this regard, if any application is filed by the petitioners seeking such a waiver of demurrage charges, the same shall be considered and decided by the respondents objectively.”

¶38

W.P.No.10190 of 2024 is disposed of on the same lines.

¶39

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶40

4/6

¶41

W.P.No.10190 of 2024

¶42

Consequently, W.M.P.No.11243 of 2024 is closed. There shall be no

¶43

order as to costs.

¶44

18.04.2024

¶45

Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Neutral Citation : Yes / No

¶46

rna

¶47

¶48

The Commissioner of Customs (Chennai II) (Imports) Customs House, No.60, Rajaji Salai, Chennai-600 001.

¶49

The Additional Commissioner of Customs (CONCOR ICD), Custom House, No.60, Rajaji Salai, Chennai-600 001.

¶50

The Deputy Commissioner of Customs, (CONCOR ICD), Custom House, No.60, Rajaji Salai, Chennai-600 001.

¶51

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY J.

¶52

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

5/6

W.P.No.10190 of 2024

rna

W.P.No.10190 of 2024 and W.M.P.No.11243 of 2024

¶57

18.04.2024

¶58

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶59

6/6

M/S. A.K. Imports and Exports v. the Commissioner of Customs

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

M/S. A.K. Imports and Exports v. the Commissioner of Customs

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tvl Stanely Hitech Construction Company (P) Ltd. Vs the State Tax Officer

Tvl Stanely Hitech Construction Company (P) Ltd. Vs the State Tax Officer

S Saravanan Vs the State Tax Officer

Shriniwas Impex Vs the State Tax Officer

M/S.Tristar Logistics Vs State Tax Officer

Tvl.Vishal Agencies, Vs the Assistant Commissioner(St)