Partly allowed

Thangaraj v. the District Collector

Madras HC26 Nov 2024WMP/37543/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of the Writ Miscellaneous Petition by acceding to the prayer to dispense with the production of a certified copy of the impugned letter due to lack of service, ordering the petitioner to submit the xerox copy instead.

What did the court decide?

Prayer to dispense with production of certified copy of impugned letter No.24/2024 and submit xerox copy instead is allowed.

Thangaraj Vs the District Collector — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.M.P.No.37543 of 2024

¶2

W.M.P.No.37543 of 2024

¶3

¶4

W.P.No.34613 of 2024

¶5

M.SUNDAR, J., and

¶6

K.RAJASEKAR, J.,

¶7

[Order of the Court was made by M.SUNDAR. J.,]

¶8

This order will now dispose of the captioned 'Writ Miscellaneous

¶9

Petition' [hereinafter 'WMP' for the sake of brevity].

¶10

Captioned WMP has been filed with a prayer to dispense with

¶11

production of 'certified copy of the impugned letter No.24/2024 dated

¶12

18.10.2024' [hereinafter 'impugned letter' for the sake of brevity, convenience and clarity].

¶13

Mr.K.Vasanthanayagan, learned counsel on record for writ

¶14

petitioner is before this Court.

¶15

Learned counsel for writ petitioner adverting to support affidavit

¶16

Page Nos.1/3

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

W.M.P.No.37543 of 2024

¶19

submitted that the impugned letter has not been served on the writ

¶20

petitioner and it has been affixed on the petitioner's house and hence, the

¶21

writ petitioner is not able to file the certified copy of impugned letter.

¶22

Learned counsel drew the attention of this Court to relevent part of

¶23

support affidavit, which reads as follows:

¶24

'The petitioner respectfully submits that the impugned notice has not been served to the petitioner and it has been affixed on the petitioner's house and hence the petitioner unable to produce the certified copy of the impugned order and therefore, the petitioner may be permitted to submit the xerox copy of the impugned notice and dispense with the production of impugned letter No.24/2024 dated 18.10.2024 and hence this petition for dispense with.'

¶25

5. In the light of the narrative thus far, dispense with prayer is

¶26

acceded to. Captioned WMP is ordered as prayed for.

¶27

[M.S., J] [K.R.S., J]

¶28

26.11.2024

¶29

¶30

Page Nos.2/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶31

W.M.P.No.37543 of 2024

¶32

M.SUNDAR, J., and K.RAJASEKAR, J.,

¶33

¶34

W.M.P.No.37543 of 2024

¶35

¶36

W.P.No.34613 of 2024

¶37

26.11.2024

¶38

(2/2)

¶39

Page Nos.3/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Thangaraj v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Thangaraj v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pazhaniamal Vs the District Collector

M.Srinivasan Vs District Collector

India Selvam, Vs the District Collector

Thangaraj Vs the District Collector

C.Arul Vs the District Collector

S.Poornam Vs the District Collector