Dismissed

M.Ravichandran(Died) (Substituted by) R.Vasuki, v. The Management of

Madras HC5 Mar 2024WA(MD)/952/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Legal heirs of a deceased transport corporation employee sought to challenge a single judge's order in a writ petition concerning transport employee pension benefits. Counsel conceded formal and technical defects in the writ petition and sought leave to withdraw it. The Division Bench permitted withdrawal, dismissing the appeal and the underlying writ petition with liberty to file afresh.

What the court decided

AI extract

M.Ravichandran(Died) (Substituted by)… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.A(MD)No.952 of 2013

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 28.08.2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR

¶6

W.A(MD)No.952 of 2013 in W.P.(MD).No.1398 of 2007

¶7

M.Ravichandran (Died)

¶8

1.R.Vasuki 2.R.Vinothkumar

3.R.Ramesh

Petitioner(s)

1.The Management of Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Ltd., Trichy Region, Rep., by its, Managing Director, Trichy. 2.The Administrator, Tamil Nadu State Transport Employee Pension Fund Trust, Thiruvalluvar Illam, Annasalai, Chennai-2. Respondent(s)

¶13

1/4

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

W.A(MD)No.952 of 2013

¶16

Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent to set aside the order passed in W.P(MD)No.1398 of 2007 dated 07.10.2010 on the file of this Court.

¶17

For Petitioner(s) : Mr.S.Arunachalam

¶18

For Respondent : Mr.S.C.Herold Singh (for R2) Standing Counsel

¶19

JUDGMENT

¶20

(By G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.)

¶21

(Judgment of the Court was made by the Hon'ble G.R.SWAMINATHAN J., )

¶22

The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the writ petition filed by the petitioners suffers from formal and technical defects. Hence, he seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition itself.

¶23

We are satisfied with the said submission and therefore, We permit the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition itself.

¶24

3.Accordingly, this writ Appeal itself dismissed as withdrawn.

¶25

Consequently, the writ petition is also dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh writ petition on the same cause of action and the

¶26

2/4

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

W.A(MD)No.952 of 2013

¶29

order dated 05.03.2024 is set aside. In the event, the petitioner succeeds in the

¶30

fresh round of writ proceedings to be initiated by him, he may not be entitled to

¶31

claim interest for the period covered by the present round of writ proceedings. No costs.

¶32

[G.R.S., J.] [K.R.S., J.] 28.08.2025 3/4

¶33

NCC : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Index : Yes / No vsg

¶34

¶35

1.The Management of Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Ltd., Trichy Region, Rep., by its, Managing Director, Trichy.

¶36

2.The Administrator,

¶37

Tamil Nadu State Transport Employee Pension Fund Trust, Thiruvalluvar Illam, Annasalai, Chennai-2

¶38

3/4

¶39

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶40

W.A(MD)No.952 of 2013

¶41

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.,

¶42

and K.RAJASEKAR, J.,

¶43

vsg

¶44

W.A(MD)No.952 of 2013

¶45

28.08.2025 3/4

¶46

4/4

¶47

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

M.Ravichandran(Died) (Substituted by) R.Vasuki, v. The Management of

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

M.Ravichandran(Died) (Substituted by) R.Vasuki, v. The Management of

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S.Reliance General Insurance Company, Vs C.Gurulakshmi

Tamil Andu State Transport Corporation Vs a.Shanmugavelu

Iffco Tokio General Insurance Company Ltd., Vs C.Isakkiammal

P. Rathinam Vs the Management of Tamil Nadu State

The Branch Manager Vs MINOR.D.GOWTHAM(DIED),1).Dhanachamy

N.Hiddayathulla Vs M.Neelakumar