Writ Appeals filed by three appellants challenging earlier orders of this Court were dismissed for default due to the non-appearance of the appellants on the hearing date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.A(MD)Nos.565 to 567 of 2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 04.04.2024
CORAM :
JUSTICE N.SESHASAYEE
and JUSTICE P.VADAMALAI
W.A(MD)Nos.565 to 567 of 2014 and MP(MD)Nos.2,2 and 2 of 2014 W.A(MD)No.565 of 2014:
S.Nagoor Kani
... Petitioner/Appellant
Vs.
2.The Tahsildar, Madurai North, Madurai.
3.K.S.Kalidas ...Respondents/Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Appeal is filed under Clause 15 of Letter Patent as against the order passed by this Court dated 30.09.2013 made in W.P(MD)No.15878 of 2013.
W.A(MD)No.566 of 2014: Senthil Kumar ... Petitioner/Appellant
Vs.
Page No.1 of 4
W.A(MD)Nos.565 to 567 of 2014
2.The Tahsildar, Madurai North, Madurai.
3.K.S.Kalidas
...Respondents/Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Appeal is filed under Clause 15 of Letter Patent as against the order passed by this Court dated 30.09.2013 made in W.P(MD)No.15879 of 2013.
W.A(MD)No.567 of 2014: M.Ravichandran ... Petitioner/Appellant Vs. 1. The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai. 2.The Tahsildar, Madurai North, Madurai.
3.K.S.Kalidas ...Respondents/Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Appeal is filed under Clause 15 of Letter Patent as against the order passed by this Court dated 30.09.2013 made in W.P(MD)No.15880 of 2013.
| In all Appeals: | |
|---|---|
| For Appellant | : No appearance |
| For R1 & R2 | : Mr.V.Nirmal Kumar |
| Government Advocate | |
| For R3 | : Mr.C.Jeganathan |
Page No.2 of 4
W.A(MD)Nos.565 to 567 of 2014
C O M M ON J U D G M E N T
[Judgment of the Court was made by N.SESHASAYEE, J. ]
On 03.04.2024, there was no representation for the appellant and therefore, the Writ Appeals were directed to be posted today under the caption 'for dismissal'. Even today, there is no representation for the appellant. Hence, these Writ Appeals are dismissed for default. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
(N.S.S., J.) & (P.V.M, J.) 04.04.2024
Index : Yes / No Neutral Citation : Yes / No CM
To,
2.The Tahsildar, Madurai North, Madurai.
Page No.3 of 4
W.A(MD)Nos.565 to 567 of 2014
N.SESHASAYEE, J. and P.VADAMALAI, J.
CM
JUDGMENT MADE IN W.A(MD)Nos.565 to 567 of 2014 and MP(MD)Nos.2,2 and 2 of 2014
04.04.2024
Page No.4 of 4
S.Nagoor Kani
Senthil Kumar
M.Ravichandran
The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai
The Tahsildar, Madurai North, Madurai
K.S.Kalidas
N.Seshasayee
P.Vadamalai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
