Dismissed

The State Of Tamil Nadu, v. The Correspondent

Madras HC3 Oct 2024WA(MD)/1739/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

State appealed against writ court order directing approval of a teacher's appointment with benefits from 01.06.2018. Court held authorities showed total non-application of mind and dismissed the appeal, ordering salary with 6% interest within 8 weeks.

What did the court decide?

Salary payable to the Teacher with interest at 6% per annum to be paid within 8 weeks; approval already effected from 01.06.2018.

The State Of Tamil Nadu, Vs The Correspondent — Education and Admissions | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.A.(MD).No.1739 of 2024

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 03.10.2024

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN and THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI

¶6

W.A.(MD).No.1739 of 2024 and

¶7

C.M.P.(MD)No.13310 of 2024

¶8

1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Secretary, Department of School Education, Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009.

¶9

2.The Director of School Education, College Road, Chennai – 600 009.

¶10

3.The Chief Educational Officer, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli.

¶11

4.The District Educational Officer, Tirunelveli Town, Tirunelveli District. ... Appellants

¶12

-vs-

¶13

The Correspondent, Amali Girls Higher Secondary School, Irudayakulam, Vickramasingapuram, Tirunelveli District. ... Respondent

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ______________

¶15

_____________ Page 1 of 4_

¶16

W.A.(MD).No.1739 of 2024

¶17

PRAYER: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent Act, against the order passed by this Court in W.P.(MD)No.24731 of 2023, dated 28.11.2023.

¶18

For Appellants : Mr.S.P.Maharajan Special Government Pleader For Respondent : Ms.A.Amala

¶19

JUDGMENT

¶20

[Judgment of the Court was made by R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.]

¶21

Ms.A.Amala, learned counsel takes notice for the respondent.

¶22

2.This Court has taken the consistent view that the approval of appointment of Teachers would depend on existence of surplus in the School, if it is a Standalone Minority School or in the Schools run by the Corporate Management, if it is a Corporate Management. The order impugned in the writ petition discloses total non application of mind on the part of the authorities concerned. They have merely cited the Government letter dated 04.12.2019 and rejected the proposal for approval. The Writ Court has rightly set aside the same and directed approval to be given with effect from 01.06.2018 with all attendant benefits. We do not find any ground to interfere in the order of the Writ Court. Hence, the Writ Appeal is dismissed.

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis _____________ Page 2 of 4_

¶24

W.A.(MD).No.1739 of 2024

¶25

3.Now it is brought to our notice that the appointment has been approved with effect from 01.06.2018, by the proceedings of the Chief Educational Officer, Tirunelveli, dated 01.08.2024. The appellant will pay the salary payable to the Teacher with interest at 6% per annum from the date of which it accrues till the date of payment. Such payment will be made within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of copy of the order. It will be open to the authorities to recover the interest paid from the Officers, who are responsible for passing the order impugned in the Writ Petition. No Costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶26

[R.S.M., J.] [L.V.G., J.] 03.10.2024

¶27

NCC :Yes/No Index :Yes/No Internet: Yes Mrn

¶28

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis _____________ Page 3 of 4_

¶29

W.A.(MD).No.1739 of 2024

¶30

R.SUBRAMANIAN, J. and L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.

¶31

Mrn

¶32

W.A.(MD).No.1739 of 2024

¶33

03.10.2024

¶34

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis _____________ Page 4 of 4_

The State Of Tamil Nadu, v. The Correspondent

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The State Of Tamil Nadu, v. The Correspondent

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Managing Director Vs v.Kalimuthan

The Chief Educational Officer Vs Central Higher Secondary School

The Registrar Judicial Vs The Joint Commissioner

M.Yuvaraja Vs The Director General of Police

The Agricultural Production Commissioner And Vs J. Murugabharathi

The Chief Educational Officer Vs The Correspondent