1963 under section 8 (1) of the said Act, they are not entitled to get patta. The vendor of the said persons are not the Inamdhar. Only if the purchase is made from the Inamdhar, they are entitled to make application under section 8 (1) of the Act. Even as per the finding of the said authority and the Learned Tribunal confirming the said original order of the authority, the properties are under the occupation of the said Muthusamy Thevar and Gurunatha Thevar. They paid the revenue charge to the Sivagangai Devasthanam and the Sivagangai Devasthanam obtained the property from the Meenakshi Sundareswarar Temple. Therefore, order to grant patta under section 8 (1) of the Tamil Nadu (Minor & Inam) Abolition Act 30 of 1963 is null and void and also illegal. Therefore, they sought to set aside the same by allowing the above civil revision and all the consequential direction issued in the various revenue proceedings which are the subject matter of the writ appeal and the writ petition are non-est in law. Even in the order of settlement Tahsildar, dated 28.06.1969, it is directed to perform the Annaabhisekam Kattalai, and direction to issue patta was issued. Therefore, they have no right to enter into partition between the family members and hence they seek to allow the writ appeal, civil revision petition in C.R.P.(MD).No.379 of 2017 and the writ petition in W.P.(MD).No.5773 of 2017.
