“12. When such being the position, the learned Judge has passed the impugned order in the writ petition filed by the respondent herein, following the aforesaid orders originally passed in WP.No.18186 of 2013 dated 12.07.2013 and WP(MD)No.20173 of 2014 dated 02.03.2015. According to the learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the appellants, the writ petitioner has suppressed the being mentioned order dated 23.07.2013 passed in WP.No.18186 of 2013 and sought the relief of awarding teaching experience marks. It is evident from the order impugned herein that the learned Judge allowed the claim of the respondent herein, on the basis of the orders originally passed in WP.No.18186 of 2013 and WP(MD)No.20173 of 2014. As already stated supra, the said two orders passed by the writ court was subsequently, modified at the instance of the appellants herein. Based on the same, Corrigendum III dated 02.08.2013 came to be issued, as per which, the respondent herein is not entitled for weightage marks for the periods viz., from 05.06.2000 to 31.05.2001, from 01.06.2001 to 31.05.2002, from 01.06.2002 to 31.05.2003, from 06.06.2003 to 31.05.2004, from 01.06.2004 to 31.05.2005, from 01.06.2005 to 31.05.2006 and from 06.09.2011 to 31.08.2012, as he was not in possession of requisite qualification and therefore, the said period was not taken into consideration for awarding marks of teaching experience, according to the
