Dismissed

The Asistant Commissioner of Income Tax v. Union Bank of India (E - Corporation Bank)

Madras HC24 Sept 2024WA/2825/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Madras held that a Writ Appeal preferred by the Revenue against their own order dated 03.11.2023 could not be entertained as the issue raised was already covered by a Supreme Court decision and a Coordinate Bench order. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed.

What did the court decide?

Writ Appeal No.2825 of 2024 dismissed. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petition closed.

The Asistant Commissioner of Income Tax Vs Union Bank of India (E… — Income Tax | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.A.No.2825 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 24.09.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN

¶6

Writ Appeal No.2825 of 2024 and CMP No.20721 of 2024

¶7

The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Office of Income Tax, Central Circle-2(1) Room No.122, First Floor, Investigation Building, 46 MG Road, Nungambakkam Chennai 600 034.

¶8

... Appellant

¶9

Vs.

¶10

1.Union of India (E-Corporation Bank) Rep.by its Authorised Officer / Assistant General Manager, Asset Recovery Management Branch, 27, Arul Manal, Whites Road Royapettah, Chennai 600 014.

¶11

2.M/s.Vasan Medical Centre India Pvt Ltd., No.70, West Minister Complex 4th Floor, Dr.R.K.Salai, Mylapore Chennai 600 004.

¶12

3.A.M.Arun

¶13

4.Meera Arun

¶14

5.Senthil Kumar

¶15

6.V.Karthikeyan

¶16

1 of 4

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

W.A.No.2825 of 2024

¶19

7.Sub Registrar Office of the Sub Registrar Mylapore.

¶20

.... Respondents

¶21

Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 03.11.2023 in W.P.No.14110 of 2020.

¶22

For Appellant : Mr.A.N.R.Jayaprathap

¶23

J U D G M E N T

¶24

(Delivered by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.)

¶25

This intra Court appeal arises out of the order passed by the writ

¶26

Court dated 03.11.2023 in W.P.No.14110 of 2020.

¶27

In fact the issue raised in this appeal is covered by a decision of the

¶28

Hon'ble Supreme Court in Connectwell Industries Pvt Ltd -Vs- Union of

¶29

India (2020) 5 SCC 373, which in fact has been followed in a detailed

¶30

order passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court in State Bank of India etc., (Vs) DCIT, ACIT etc., in W.A.No.1512 of 2021 etc., batch reported

¶31

in 2022 (12) TMI 557 equivalent to (2024) 463 ITR 244 (Mad) .

¶32

2 of 4

¶33

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶34

W.A.No.2825 of 2024

¶35

Since this position is not controverted, the writ appeal cannot be

¶36

entertained as the same has been preferred by the Revenue. In that view of the matter, this writ appeal is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, it is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶37

(R.S.K.,J.) (C.S.N.,J.)

¶38

24.09.2024

¶39

NCS : Yes/No Index : Yes/No KST To

¶40

1.Union of India (E-Corporation Bank) Rep.by its Authorised Officer / Assistant General Manager, Asset Recovery Management Branch, 27, Arul Manal, Whites Road Royapettah, Chennai 600 014.

¶41