“ 16. The order of learned Single Judge dismissing the Writ Petition No.5398 of 2006 and WP.Nos.4211 and 6517 of 2009 thus stands set aside. By the impugned order dated 26.09.2013, bearing G.O.Ms.No.748 Home (Police-XVII) Department, the respondent has set aside the findings of the enquiry officer regarding count 1, 4 of Charge-I, Charge-II and Charge-III, and has imposed the punishment of dismissal from service. The first respondent while passing impugned order accepted the recommendation of the Public Service Commission. The question which arises as to whether after the Division Bench has set aside the order of the learned Single Judge dismissing the Writ Petition Nos. 5398 of 2006, 4211 and 6517 of 2009, could the department have proceeded ahead with departmental proceedings?. It is further pertinent to note that in any event, the time limit fixed by this Court in WP.No.2252 of 2008 of three months had not been to adhere to. Time was not extended by this Court. The enquiry could not been continued further. In any event, the judgment of the learned Single Judge in WP.No.5398 of 2006 and WP.No.4211 and 6517 of 2009, has been set aside. The result would be that the Writ Petition Nos.4211 and 6517 of 2009, with prayer to quash the impugned proceedings dated 18.02.2000 and
