Disposed

The Executive Officer v. N. Lilli Vasantha Kumari

Madras HC10 Jun 2024WA/2084/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ appeal by Sembakkam Town Panchayat against a writ order concerning employees' service benefits was disposed of since the issues were covered by a Full Bench judgment pending before the Supreme Court in an SLP; respondents entitled to any benefits granted by the Apex Court.

What did the court decide?

Respondents-employees entitled to benefits if any granted by the Supreme Court in the pending SLP.

The Executive Officer Vs N. Lilli Vasantha Kumari — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

W.A.No.2084 of 2021

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 10.06.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM

¶6

AND

¶7

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN

¶8

W.A.No.2084 of 2021

¶9

and

¶10

CMP.No.13189 of 2021

¶11

The Executive Officer Sembakkam Town Panchayat, Kancheepuram District. Presently, Commissioner, Sembakkam Municipality Sembakkam.

¶12

... Appellant

¶13

Vs.

¶14

N.Lilli Vasanthakumari 2. The Secretary to Government, Municipal Administration and Water Supply Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-9.

¶15

The Director of Special Town Panchayat, Kuralagam, Chennai-600 108.

¶16

... Respondents

¶17

Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent praying to set aside the order dated 12.04.2019 made in W.P.No.9129 of 2013.

¶18

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/4

¶19

W.A.No.2084 of 2021

¶20

For Appellant : Mr.P.Srinivas

¶21

For Respondents : Mr.M.Vijayakumar for R1 Mr.R.Neelakandan Additional Advocate General for R2 & R3 *****

¶22

J U D G M E N T

¶23

[Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. ]

¶24

The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant-Sembakkam Town Panchayat Mr.P.Srinivas would submit that the issues raised in the Writ Appeal are no more res integra. The Full Bench of this Court considered the issues in Rev.Aplc.(MD) No.87 of 2014 in WA(MD).No.729 of 2013 etc., and delivered the judgment on 30.05.2017. The said Full Bench judgment has taken by way of Appeal before the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in SLP (C) No.21935 of 2017 and subjudiced. That being the factum, the respondent-Employees is entitled for the benefit if any granted by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the pending SLP. In other words, the order to be passed by the Apex Court is to be extended to the respondents in the matter of granting service benefits.

¶25

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/4

¶26

2/4

¶27

W.A.No.2084 of 2021

¶28

With the above observations, the Writ Appeal stands disposed of.

¶29

No costs. Consequently, connected CMP is also closed.

¶30

[S.M.S., J.] [C.K., J.] 10.06.2024

¶31

kmi Index : Yes Speaking order : Yes Neutral Citation : Yes/No

¶32

¶33

The Secretary to Government, Municipal Administration and Water Supply Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-9.

¶34

The Director of Special Town Panchayat, Kuralagam, Chennai-600 108.

¶35

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 3/4

¶36

W.A.No.2084 of 2021

¶37

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. and C.KUMARAPPAN, J.

kmi

W.A.No.2084 of 2021

10.06.2024

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 4/4

The Executive Officer v. N. Lilli Vasantha Kumari

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Executive Officer v. N. Lilli Vasantha Kumari

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A.Arul Anbarasu Vs Govt of Tamil Nadu

K.Jansirani Vs The Registrar General

State of Tamilnadu Vs G.Vanitha D.E.C.E.

The Secretary, Government of Tamilnadu Vs B.Bhuvaneswari

The State of Tamilnadu Vs Dr.Md.Niamathulla Hussain

A.Kalpanadevi Vs Special Commissioner