The State v. D.Chinnusamy
Case brief
What is this about?
In this Writ Appeal challenging an interim order, the Court observed that the underlying Writ Petition was disposed of and its compliance assured. The Appeal was consequently dismissed as infructuous.
What did the court decide?
Writ Appeal dismissed as infructuous; connected Miscellaneous Petition closed.
What the court decided
W.A.No.1816 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 18.04.2024
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU
W.A.No.1816 of 2021 and C.M.P.No.11418 of 2021
- The State, represented by its Secretary, Department of Law, Secretariat, Government of Tamil Nadu,
Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009.
- The Director, O/o.Directorate of Legal Studies, Kilpauk, Chennai-600 010.
Kilpauk, Chennai-600 010. ... Appellant/Respondents -vs1. D.Chinnusamy ... Respondent/Petitioner
- The Member Secretary, Teachers Recruitment Board, 4th Floor, EVK Sampath Maaligai, DPI Compound, College Road, Chennai-600 006.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
State, represented by its Secretary, Department of Law, Govt. of Tamil Nadu
- respondent
D.Chinnusamy
- respondent
Member Secretary, Teachers Recruitment Board
- respondent
Registrar, Tamil Nadu Dr.Ambedkar Law University
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court