Writ appeal against dismissal of a writ petition challenging 1986 land acquisition proceedings for re-conveyance under Section 48(B). The Division Bench found acquisition, award and possession were duly concluded, compensation deposited, and dismissed the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.A.No.1331 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 01.08.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM and
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN
W.A.No.1331 of 2022 and C.M.P.No.8417 of 2022
Vs.
Rep. by Commissioner and Secretary to Government, Housing and Urban Development, Fort St. George, Chennai – 9.
1/6
W.A.No.1331 of 2022
Prayer :-
Prayer :- Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, praying to set aside the order in WP No.31224 of 2013 dated 15.11.2021 on the file of this Hon'ble Court.
For Appellants : Mrs.Srimathi V.
For Respondents : Mr.A.Selvendran, Special Government Pleader (for R1, R3 & R4)
J U D G E M E N T
(Judgement of the Court was delivered by S.M.Subramaniam J.)
The writ appeal has been instituted by the writ petitioners
challenging the order passed in WP No.31224 of 2013 dated 15.11.2021.
also made a request to the Land Acquisition Officer to settle the entire
2/6
W.A.No.1331 of 2022
compensation to her and to her sons. Considering the fact that the land acquisition proceedings were concluded in accordance with the provisions of the Act and the compensation determined had already been deposited by the respondents, the Writ Court rejected the writ petition.
of Indore Development Authority Vs. Manoharlal and Ors .1 . Thus, we
3/6
1 (2020) 8 SCC 129
W.A.No.1331 of 2022
do not find any infirmity in respect of the findings made in the writ order
impugned. Consequently, the writ appeal stands dismissed. No costs.
Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
(S.M.S.J.,) (C.K.J.,) 01.08.2024
Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes/No Speaking order/Non-Speaking order Neutral Citation : Yes/No (sha)
4/6
W.A.No.1331 of 2022
To
5/6
W.A.No.1331 of 2022
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. and
C.KUMARAPPAN, J.
(sha)
W.A.No.1331 of 2022
01.08.2024
6/6
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the completed land acquisition proceedings of 1986 could be challenged after compensation was deposited and possession taken.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Indore Development Authority Vs. Manoharlal and OrsRelied on¶5
(2020) 8 SCC 129 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Gandhi Prasad
S.N. Kirubanandam
S.N. Krishnamoorthy
S.N. Bakthavatchalam
The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by Commissioner and Secretary to Government, Housing and Urban Development, Chennai
The Chairman and Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Housing Board, Nandanam, Chennai
S.M.Subramaniam
C.Kumarappan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
