A.Ramasami v. S.G.Perumal
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Madras held that a writ appeal filed to set aside a previous writ order infructuous as the respondent department had complied with that order. The appeal was dismissed without costs.
What did the court decide?
The writ appeal was dismissed as infructuous with no costs awarded.
What the court decided
W.A.No.1096 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 13.06.2024
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR
and
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K. KUMARESH BABU
W.A.No.1096 of 2022
- A.Ramasami
- P.Govindasamy ... Appellants
Vs.
- S.G.Perumal
- The State of Tamil Nadu, rep. by Secretary to Government, HR & CE Department, Secretariat,
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ appeal remains maintainable after the writ court order was complied with by the respondent department.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
A.Ramasami
- appellant
P.Govindasamy
- respondent
The State of Tamil Nadu
- respondent
The Commissioner, HR & CE Department
- respondent
The District Collector, Vellore
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court