Allowed

Krishnaveni, v. Shanmugavel

Madras HC14 Mar 2024TR CMP(MD)/80/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Wife sought transfer of husband's matrimonial original petition from Family Court, Puducherry to Sub Court, Ambasamudram for trial along with her own matrimonial petition there, citing travel difficulty. The court allowed the transfer on the ground of the wife's convenience.

What did the court decide?

M.O.P.No.764 of 2023 withdrawn from Family Court, Puducherry and transferred to Sub Court, Ambasamudram to try along with H.M.O.P.No.110 of 2023.

Krishnaveni, Vs Shanmugavel — Matrimonial and Divorce | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

Tr.C.M.P.(MD).No.80 of 2024

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 14.03.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN

¶6

Tr.C.M.P.(MD).No.80 of 2024 and C.M.P.(MD).No.1350 of 2024

¶7

Krishnaveni ... Petitioner/Respondent

¶8

Vs.

¶9

Shanmugavel ... Respondent/Petitioner

¶10

PRAYER : Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 24 of the Civil Procedure Code, to withdraw and transfer the M.O.P.No.764

¶11

of 2023 from the file of the Family Court, Puducherry to the file of Sub

¶12

Court, Ambasamudram and try along with H.M.O.P.No.110 of 2023.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.M.R.Sreenivasan

¶14

For Respondent : No Appearance

¶15

ORDER

¶16

This petition has been filed to withdraw and transfer the M.O.P.No.764 of 2023 from the file of the Family Court, Puducherry to

¶17

the file of Sub Court, Ambasamudram and try along with H.M.O.P.No. 110 of 2023.

¶18

1/4

¶19

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶20

Tr.C.M.P.(MD).No.80 of 2024

¶21

2.The facts in brief:

¶22

The marriage of the parties was solemnized on 10.06.2018. Out of the above said wedlock they blessed with a child. Thereafter, due to some misunderstanding they separated and the above said M.O.P. proceedings was initiated by the respondent before the Family Court, Puducherry. The petitioner is facing difficulty to travel long distance to attend the above said proceedings at Puducherry. Moreover, the petitioner filed H.M.O.P.No.110 of 2023 before the Sub Court, Ambasamudram. Hence, seeking transfer this petition has been filed.

¶23

3.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. Even though the respondent was served with notice, none appears on behalf of him. His name was also printed in the cause list.

¶24

4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the convenience of the wife, the M.O.P.No.764 of 2023 filed by the respondent on the file of the Family Court, Puducherry, is ordered to be withdrawn and transferred to the Sub Court, Ambasamudram to try along with H.M.O.P.No.110 of 2023.

¶25

2/4

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

Tr.C.M.P.(MD).No.80 of 2024

¶28

5.Accordingly, this transfer civil miscellaneous petition is allowed.

¶29

No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶30

14.03.2024 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No TM

¶31

¶32

1.The Judge, Family Court, Puducherry.

¶33

2.The Subordinate Judge, Ambasamudram.

¶34

3.The Section Officer, E.R.Section/V.R.Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶35

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶36

3/4

¶37

Tr.C.M.P.(MD).No.80 of 2024

¶38

G.ILANGOVAN ,J.

¶39

¶40

Tr.C.M.P.(MD).No.80 of 2024

¶41

14.03.2024

¶42

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶43

4/4

Krishnaveni, v. Shanmugavel

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Krishnaveni, v. Shanmugavel

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Malaiyayi Vs C.Velmurugan

Madhankumar Vs The Inspector of police

Samayamuthu Vs State of Tamilnadu

Sindhu Shree Vs Kumaresan

Meiyammai Vs N.Nachiyappan

P.Chinnaraj Vs Errammal @ Chellathai