Aarthi v. G. Sharma
Case brief
What is this about?
Wife sought transfer of husband's divorce petition from Dindigul to Chengalpet, pleading she could not travel 375 km. The court held the wife's convenience takes priority and transferred the divorce proceedings to Chengalpet.
What did the court decide?
O.P.No.369 of 2022 withdrawn from Family Court, Dindigul and transferred to Family Court, Chengalpet; husband need attend only hearings where presence is essential; no costs.
What the court decided
Tr.C.M.P.No.390 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 06.11.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN
Tr.C.M.P.No.390 of 2023 and C.M.P.No.8476 of 2023
Aarthi .. Petitioner
Vs.
G.Sharma .. Respondent
PRAYER : Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 24 of the Civil Procedure Code, to withdraw and transfer O.P.No.369 of 2022 from the file of the Family Court at Dindigul to the file of the Family Court at Chengalpet.
For Petitioner : Mr.M.Sarfudeen Ali Ahamed
For Respondent : Mr.Harish Parvatham
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether O.P.No.369 of 2022 pending before the Family Court, Dindigul should be transferred to the Family Court at Chengalpet on the ground of the wife's inconvenience in travelling.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Aarthi
- respondent
G.Sharma
Coram
V.Lakshminarayanan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court