Allowed

Chandraleka v. M.Rajamuthu

Madras HC25 Oct 2024TR CMP/366/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Wife sought transfer of her husband's divorce petition from Family Court, Coimbatore to Sub Court, Mayiladuthurai, citing residence and care of two school-going children there. Considering the wife's convenience, the court allowed the transfer and closed the connected miscellaneous petition.

What did the court decide?

H.M.O.P.No.1846 of 2023 withdrawn from Family Court, Coimbatore and transferred to Sub Court, Mayiladuthurai; connected CMP closed; no costs.

Chandraleka Vs M.Rajamuthu — Matrimonial and Divorce | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

Tr.C.M.P.No.366 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

Dated : 25.10.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN

¶6

Tr.C.M.P.No.366 of 2024 & C.M.P.No. 7719 of 2024

Chandraleka

...Petitioner

Vs.

Rajamuthu ...Respondent

¶11

Prayer: Petition filed under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure to withdraw H.M.O.P.No.1846 of 2023, on the file of the Family

¶12

Court, Coimbatore and transfer the same to the Sub Court, Mayiladuthurai.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr. B.Jawahar

¶14

For Respondent : Mr. Prahlad K Bhat.

¶15

1/5

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

Tr.C.M.P.No.366 of 2024

¶18

ORDER

¶19

The petitioner is the wife. She has initiated this proceedings for

¶20

transfer of H.M.O.P.No.1846 2023 from the file of the Family Court, Coimbatore, to the file of the Sub Court, Mayiladuthurai. The plea of the petitioner is that she is a permanent resident of Nallathukudi at Mayiladuthurai District. She adds that she has two children, one aged about 12 years and the other aged about 10 years. Both of them are studying at Mayiladuthurai. She pleads that she is unable to travel from Mayiladuthurai to Coimbatore, to contest the proceedings initiated by the husband for divorce. Hence, this petition for transfer.

¶21

Mr.Prahlad K Bhat submitted that the wife is residing in Malaysia. I passed over the matter for Mr.Jawahar to get instructions in this regard. On instructions, Mr.Jawahar pleads that the wife is residing in Mayiladuthurai and not at Malaysia.

¶22

2/5

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

Tr.C.M.P.No.366 of 2024

¶25

Taking into consideration the convenience of the wife, who is

¶26

taking care of two young children, I am inclined to transfer H.M.O.P.No.1846 of 2023 from the file of the Family Court, Coimbatore, to the file of the Sub Court, Mayiladuthurai.

¶27

The Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is allowed.

¶28

Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs.

¶29

25.10.2024

¶30

Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No kan

¶31

3/5

¶32

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶33

Tr.C.M.P.No.366 of 2024

¶34

¶35

1.The Family Court, Coimbatore.

¶36

2.The Sub Court, Mayiladuthurai.

¶37

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶38

4/5

¶39

Tr.C.M.P.No.366 of 2024

¶40

V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J.

¶41

kan

¶42

Tr.C.M.P.No.366 of 2024

¶43

25.10.2024

¶44

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶45

5/5

Chandraleka v. M.Rajamuthu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chandraleka v. M.Rajamuthu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vasantharani Vs Naveen Kishore

K. Kandhasamy (Died) 1. Lakshmi Vs P. Ramasamy

M. Venkatesan Vs D. Jamuna

Latha Vs Public Prosecutor

Krishnapriya Vs Kt Jhegadish Chandar

Parveen Vs S.Abdul Rasheed