K.S.v.Raman v. B.Ravishankar
Case brief
What is this about?
The plaintiff failed to appear in person or through counsel on the hearing dates, leading to the dismissal of the Testamentary Original Suit for non-prosecution without costs.
What did the court decide?
Suit dismissed for non-prosecution with no costs awarded.
What the court decided
T.O.S No.17 of 2005
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Date : 29.10.2024
CORAM:
THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN
T.O.S.No.17 of 2005
(O.P No.139 of 2005)
T.K.Ramanathan
... Plaintiff
Vs.
1.B.Ravishankar 2.Anuradha Subramanian
... Defendants
Prayer : Original Petition has been filed under Sections 222 and 276 of the Indian Succession Act XXXIX of 1925 r/w Order XXV Rule 4 of O.S Rules, praying for grant of Probate in respect of last Will and Testament of the deceased K.S.V.Raman. Against this petition, Caveat and supporting affidavit were filed by the Caveators. As per order of this Court, the Original Petition No.139 of 2005 was converted into Testamentary Original Suit No.17 of 2005.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Testamentary Original Suit for grant of Probate can be dismissed for non-prosecution.
Parties & counsel
- respondent
B.Ravishankar
- respondent
Anuradha Subramanian
Coram
A.A.Nakkiran
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court