Tax case appeal under Section 260A against Tribunal order for block assessment periods; counsel endorsed that the appellant does not wish to pursue the appeal having succeeded in consequential proceedings on merit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:MHC:3779
T.C.A.No.372 of 2009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 06.11.2024
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G. ARUL MURUGAN
T.C.A.No.372 of 2009
V.K.Moidoo Hajee (Deceased)
vs
The Dy. Commissioner of Income-Tax, Central Circle II (3), Chennai – 600 034. .. Respondent
Prayer : Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act 1961 against the order dated 12.01.202009 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai in IT (SS) A No.12/Mds/2007 for the block assessment period 1.4.1996 to 31.03.2002 and 01.04.2002 to 22.01.2003.
For Appellant : Mr.N.V.Balaji For Respondents : Mr.Karthik Ranganathan Senior Standing Counsel
1/2
T.C.A.No.372 of 2009
DR. ANITA SUMANTH.,J. and G. ARUL MURUGAN.,J.
JUDGMENT (Delivered by Dr. ANITA SUMANTH.,J)
Mr.N.V.Balaji, learned counsel, makes an endorsement to the effect
that the appellant does not wish to pursue this appeal as it has succeeded in the consequential proceedings on merit.
pressed. No costs.
[A.S.M., J] [G.A.M., J] 06.11.2024
Index:Yes/No Neutral Citation:Yes ssm
To
The Dy. Commissioner of Income-Tax, Central Circle II (3), Chennai – 600 034.
T.C.A.No.372 of 2009
2/2
1 provisions across 1 enactments
V.K.Moidoo Hajee (Deceased)
Shira MK
Sameera MK
Sareena MK
Siraj MK
Nafeesa MK
Anita Sumanth
G. Arul Murugan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
