Allowed

C.Velavendan v. Thiru. Kumaragrubharan and 4 others

Madras HC3 Dec 2024SUB APPL/643/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought reopening of a contempt petition closed on 14.06.2024 alleging non-implementation of a reservation order by education and welfare officials. The court allowed the sub application and restored the contempt petition.

What did the court decide?

Contempt Petition No.915 of 2024 restored; Registry directed to post it on 10.01.2025.

C.Velavendan Vs Thiru. Kumaragrubharan and 4 others — Contempt of Court | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

Sub Application No.643 of 2024 in Contempt Petition No.915 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 03.12.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR

¶6

Sub Application No.643 of 2024

¶7

in Contempt Petition No.915 of 2024

¶8

C.Velavendan ... Petitioner

¶9

-vs-

¶10

Thiru.Kumaragrubharan State of Tamil Nadu, The Secretary, Department of School Education Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009.

¶11

Thiru. Nagaraj, Secretary Department of Welfare of differently abled persons Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009.

¶12

Tmt.M.Lakshim, The Commissioner, Welfare of the Differently abled Persons, 26Ms+9Nh, K.K.Nagar, Chennai - 600 083.

¶13

Thiru. Arivoli, The Commissioner / Director of School Education, School Education, DPI Campus, Chennai 600 006.

¶14

Thiru. Rajenderan, Joint Director (Personnel) School Education, DPI Campus, Chennai 600 006.

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

1/4

¶17

Sub Application No.643 of 2024 in Contempt Petition No.915 of 2024

¶18

Respondents

¶19

This Sub Application filed under Section 151 C.P.C to reopen the Contempt Petition No.915 of 2024 which was closed on 14.06.2024.

¶20

For Petitioner :: M/s. S.Suneetha For Respondents :: Mrs.P.Rajarajeswari Government Advocate

¶21

ORDER

¶22

Seeking to reopen the contempt petition, the petitioner has filed this

¶23

contempt petition alleging that the order of this Court dated 14.06.2024 has not been complied with by the respondents.

¶24

It is represented by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that this court based on the submission made by the Government Advocate that the Government is in the process of implementing the reservation and it also required to take into consideration the various factors. This Court vide order dated 14.06.2024 closed the contempt petition. But the same has not been complied with till date.

¶25

In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this sub application is ordered. The contempt

¶26

2/4

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

Sub Application No.643 of 2024 in Contempt Petition No.915 of 2024

¶29

petition is restored.

¶30

Registry is directed to post the contempt petition on 10.01.2025.

¶31

Index : Yes/No 03.12.2024 Internet : Yes/No

¶32

¶33

3/4

¶34

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶35

Sub Application No.643 of 2024 in Contempt Petition No.915 of 2024

¶36

N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.

¶37

¶38

Sub Application No.643 of 2024 in Contempt Petition No.915 of 2024

¶39

03.12.2024

¶40

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶41

4/4

C.Velavendan v. Thiru. Kumaragrubharan and 4 others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

C.Velavendan v. Thiru. Kumaragrubharan and 4 others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anbu Selvam Vs Mrs.Bama and 1 other

S. Baskar Vs S. Ranjithkumar

G.v.Kamalammal Vs Kamalakannan

G.Marimuthu Vs the Chairman/Member

Jayashree Jayanth Vs P.B.Nanjaiah Lingammal Charities Trust

N. Chinnusamy Vs Sathya Priya