A.v.Rajaram v. Narayanasamy
Case brief
What is this about?
Second Appeal under Section 100 CPC was dismissed as abated because the sole appellant died on 09.09.2024 and no substitution or representation was filed within the limitation period.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed as abated due to death of appellant without substitution.
What the court decided
S.A.(MD)No.844 of 2004
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 16.12.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAM
S.A.(MD)No.844 of 2006
A.V.Rajaram ...Plaintiff/Appellant/Appellant
-Vs-
1.Narayanasamy
2.Govindammal
3.Nammalvar Naicker
(The 3rd respondent set ex-parte in the Lower Appellate Court. Hence 3rd respondent herein may be given up)
Parties & counsel
- appellant
A.V.Rajaram
- respondent
Narayanasamy
- respondent
Govindammal
- respondent
Nammalvar Naicker
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court