Dismissed
Karuppan, (Died) v. Paraman
Madras HCSA(MD)/756/2005
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Second Appeal filed under Section 100 CPC was dismissed for default as the appellants failed to appear in court on the appointed date despite being listed, after their counsel had withdrawn earlier.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
S.A.(MD)No.756 of 2005
¶2
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
¶3
DATED : 05.12.2024
¶4
CORAM:
¶5
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAM
¶6
S.A.(MD)No.756 of 2005 and C.M.P(MD)No.4954 of 2005
¶7
1.Karuppan(died)
¶8
...Plaintiff/Appellant/Appellant
¶9
2.K.Alagammal
¶10
3.K.Marimuthu
¶11
4.K.Alagarsamy
¶12
5.J.Chitra
¶13
(Appellants 2 to 5 are brought on record as LR's of the deceased sole appellant vide order dated 12.10.2011 made in
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Karuppan (died) and others
- respondent
Paraman
Coram
AI extract
V.SIVAGNANAM
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court