R.Ganasekaran v. T.Krishnan
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court dismissed a second appeal due to non-prosecition as the appellants' counsel withdrew vakalat without client instructions and the respondent was absent.
What did the court decide?
Second appeal dismissed for non-prosecution; liberty granted to restore if so advised.
What the court decided
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 03.12.2024
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY
S.A(MD)No. 75 of 2012
- R.Ganasekaran
- C.Krishnamoorthy ... Appellants
Vs.
T.Krishnan
... Respondent
PRAYER: Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code, against the Judgment and Decree dated 12.11.2011 made in A.S.No.51 of 2011 on the file of the Learned Principal Subordinate Judge, Kumbakonam, confirming the decree and Judgment dated 24.06.2011 made in O.S.No.297 of 2008 on the file of the Learned Principal District Munsif, Kumbakonam.
For Appellant : M/s.N.Tamilmani For Respondent : No appearance JUDGEMENT
Parties & counsel
- appellant
R. Ganasekaran
- appellant
C. Krishnamoorthy
- respondent
T. Krishnan
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court