Second appeal against a land-related civil suit decree. The sole appellant had died and his legal representatives took no steps to continue the appeal; the court dismissed the second appeal as abated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED :12.07.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR
S.A(MD)No.545 of 2009
Chinnadurai :Appellant/Respondent/Plaintiff
.vs.
PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree made in A.S.No.53 of 2007, dated 12.12.2008, on the file of Sub-Court, Sankarankovil against the judgment and decree made in O.S.No.64 of 2001, dated 22.02.2005, on the file of District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate Court, Sivagiri.
For Appellant :Mr.F.X.Eugene For Respondents :Mr.SRA.Ramachandran Addl.Govt.Pleader
2
**JUDGMENT ***************
The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents produced a copy of the Death Certificate of the appellant. A perusal of the same would suggest that the appellant Chinnadurai died on 04.02.2021. The learned counsel for the appellant submits that the legal representatives of the deceased sole appellant have not contacted him to take steps.
costs.
12.07.2024
Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No NCC:Yes/No
vsn
To
3
S.SOUNTHAR, J.
vsn
JUDGMENT MADE IN S.A(MD)No.545 of 2009
12.07.2024
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Chinnadurai
The District Collector, Collector Office, Kokkirakulam, Tirunelveli
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Thenkasi
The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Sivagiri
S.Sounthar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
