Dismissed
S.Rajaiyan v. S.Mariyadhas
Madras HCSA(MD)/465/2006
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The Madras High Court dismissed the second appeal as abated since the sole appellant died without bringing legal heirs on record within the limitation period.
What did the court decide?
Second Appeal dismissed as abated.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
S.A.(MD)No.465 of 2006
¶2
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
¶3
DATED : 18.11.2024
¶4
CORAM:
¶5
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAM
¶6
S.A.(MD)No.465 of 2006
¶7
S.Rajaiyan
¶8
.. Appellant
¶9
-Vs-
¶10
1.S.Mariyadhas
¶11
2.S.Yesudhas
¶12
3.C.Sundarraj 4.Y.John Selvin
¶13
5.Amala Pushbam
¶14
(Respondents 1 to 3 are exparty in the lower Court)
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
S.Rajaiyan
- respondent
S.Mariyadhas
- respondent
S.Yesudhas
- respondent
C.Sundarraj
- respondent
Y.John Selvin
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court