In Second Appeals arising between a construction contractor and the TWAD Board, the High Court dismissed the appeals as infructuous because the main contract was completed and payments were settled. No adjudication survived.
Second appeals dismissed as infructuous; no costs. Connected miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S.A.(MD).Nos. 394, 453 to 456 of 2012 of 2012
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 18.12.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY
S.A.(MD).Nos. 394, 453 to 456 of 2012 and
M.P(MD)Nos.1, 1, 1, 1 & 1 of 2012
S.A.(MD).Nos. 394 of 2012
/Vs./
M/s.Raja Constructions, Represented by its Sole Proprietor, S.N.Dhanasekar.
...Respondent
PRAYER : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure
Code, against the Judgment and Decree dated 06.03.2012 in A.S.No.88 of 2011 on the file of the Learned Principal Subordinate Judge, Dindigul,
1/4
S.A.(MD).Nos. 394, 453 to 456 of 2012 of 2012
reversing the Judgment and Decree dated 27.07.2011 in O.S.No.637 of 2010 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Dindigul.
For Appellants : Mr.B.Vijay Karthikeyan For Respondent : Mr.M.Mohammed Ibram Saibu
COMMON JUDGMENT
The issue involved in both the Second Appeals are arising between the Contractor and TWAD Board and hence the following common Judgment is passed.
main contract has been completed and extension granted by the TWAD Board is not necessary. The prayer in the Second appeals were also granted. And the contract was also completed. The main contract and all the contractors had received payment also. Therefore, nothing survives for adjudication.
2/4
S.A.(MD).Nos. 394, 453 to 456 of 2012 of 2012
infructuous. No Costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
18.12.2024
Index : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No KSA
TO:
2. The Principal District Munsif Court, Dindigul
3/4
S.A.(MD).Nos. 394, 453 to 456 of 2012 of 2012
S.SRIMATHY, J.
ksa
Common Judgment made in S.A.(MD)Nos. 394, 453 to 456 of 2012
18.12.2024
Tamilnadu Water Supply and Drainage Board
M/s. Raja Constructions
S.Srimary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
