V. Backiyanathan, v. v. Karuppaiah
Case brief
What is this about?
This second appeal was disposed of by confirming a joint compromise memo entered into by the parties regarding the division of property.
What did the court decide?
The compromise memo and the attached sketch are made part of the decree; second appeal disposed of with no costs.
What the court decided
S.A.(MD).No.390 of 2023
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 06.06.2024
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN
S.A.(MD).No.390 of 2023 and C.M.P.(MD).No8310 of 2023
1.V.Backiyanathan 2.P.Thirumalairajan ... Appellants/Appellants/Defendans
Vs.
V.Karuppaiah ... Respondent/Respondent/Plaintiff
PRAYER : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, to call for the records and set aside the decree and judgment dated 18.10.2022 in A.S.No.144 of 2016 on the file of the Sub
Court, Manamadurai, by confirming the Judgment and Decree, dated 24.08.2017 made in O.S.No.100 of 2009 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Manamadurai.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the second appeal in the property suit should be disposed of in view of the out-of-court settlement reached between the parties.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
V.Backiyanathan
- appellant
P.Thirumalairajan
- respondent
V.Karuppaiah
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court