Soori v. Alagan
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madras High Court dismissed the second appeal for default due to the non-appearance of the appellant on the dates fixed for hearing, while the second respondent failed to appear. The connected miscellaneous petition stands closed.
What did the court decide?
Second Appeal dismissed for default with costs; connected miscellaneous petition closed.
What the court decided
S.A(MD)No.364 of 2007
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 25.11.2024
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN
S.A(MD)No.364 of 2007 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2007
Soori ... Appellant / 2nd Respondent / 2nd Defendant
1.Alagan 2.Kumaresan ... Respondents / Plaintiffs
Prayer : This Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., to allow the Second Appeal against the judgment and decree dated 29.11.2006 passed in A.S.No.154/06 on the file of the learned Principle Subordinate Judge, Madurai, reversing the judgment dated 24.04.2006 passed in O.S.No.570/2004 on the file of the learned District Munsif Court, Melur.
For Appellants : No appearance For R1 : No appearance For R2 : Mr.A.Bhuvaneswawri
1/3
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Soori
- respondent
1.Alagan 2.Kumaresan
Coram
G.ILANGOVAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court