Appellant in a second appeal arising from a suit and first appeal sought leave to withdraw the appeal. The High Court granted leave, dismissed the second appeal as withdrawn with no order as to costs, and closed the connected miscellaneous petitions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S.A(MD)No.362 of 2007
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 16.07.2024
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR
S.A(MD)No.362 of 2007 and
M.P(MD)Nos.1 & 2 of 2007
K.Chinnasamy ... Appellant/Appellant 1st Defendant
Vs.
1.K.Periyasamy, Represented by his Power Agent, P.Chinnasamy @ P.C.Samy. ... Respondent/1st Respondent Plaintiff
2.K.Velu ... 2nd Respondent/2nd Respondent 2nd Defendant
PRAYER : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree, dated 29.09.2005 made in A.S.No.29 of 2004 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Srivilliputhur preferred against the judgment and decree, dated 27.02.2003 made in O.S.No.84 of 1999 on the file of the Additional District Munsif, Srivilliputhur.
For Appellant : Mr.A.R.M.Ganesh For R-1 : Mr.P.Velmurugan
S.A(MD)No.362 of 2007
JUDGMENT
The learned Counsel appearing for the appellant made an endorsement seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the Second Appeal. Leave is granted. Hence, this Second Appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions stand closed.
16.07.2024
NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes BTR
To
2/3
S.A(MD)No.362 of 2007
S.SOUNTHAR, J.
BTR
Judgment made in S.A(MD)No.362 of 2007
Dated: 16.07.2024
1 provisions across 1 enactments
K.Chinnasamy
K.Periyasamy, Represented by his Power Agent, P.Chinnasamy @ P.C.Samy
K.Velu
S.Sounthar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
