In this second appeal under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, the appellant was reported to be deceased. Consequently, the court dismissed the appeal as abated without costs.
The appeal is dismissed as abated due to the death of the appellant. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S.A.(MD).No.312 of 2007
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 02.12.2024
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN
S.A.(MD).No.312 of 2007
K.Ganesan ... Defendant/Appellant/Appellant
Vs.
K.Ramachandra Boopathy ... Plaintiff/Respondent/Respondent
PRAYER : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the Judgment and Decree dated 15.04.2005 made in A.S.No.35 of 2004 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Paramakudi, confirming the Judgment and Decree dated 21.04.2004 and
made in O.S.No.23 of 1998 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Kamuthi.
For Appellant : Mr.K.Sekar For Respondent : Mr.C.Ganesh Kumar
1/3
S.A.(MD).No.312 of 2007
JUDGMENT
The appellant reported to be dead long back. The date of death is
not known to the counsel for the appellant. Accordingly, this second
appeal is dismissed as abated. no costs.
02.12.2024 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No TM
To
1.The Subordinate Judge, Paramakudi.
2.The District Munsif, Kamudhi.
3.The Section Officer, E.R.Section/V.R.Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
2/3
S.A.(MD).No.312 of 2007
G.ILANGOVAN ,J.
TM
S.A.(MD).No.312 of 2007
02.12.2024
3/3
1 provisions across 1 enactments
K.Ganesan
K.Ramachandra Boopathy
G.ILANGOVAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
