Akilandam v. Sekar
Case brief
What is this about?
Second appeal against concurrent decrees; the sole respondent died during pendency and no steps were taken to bring his legal representatives on record, so the appeal was dismissed as abated.
What the court decided
S.A.(MD) No.250 of 2012
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 23.08.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Ms.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA
S.A.(MD) No.250 of 2012
1.Akilandam
2.Selvi
... Appellants
vs.
Sekar
...Respondent
Prayer:- Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to set aside the judgment and decreetal order passed by the learned Principal District Judge, Pudukkottai dated 12.08.2009 made in A.S.No.11 of 2008 confirming the judgment and decreetal order passed by the learned Sub Judge, Pudukkottai in O.S.No.61 of 2004 dated 28.04.2006.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Akilandam
- appellant
Selvi
- respondent
Sekar
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court