A.Periakaruppan, (Died) v. Tmt.K.Pandithurai
Case brief
What is this about?
Second appeal dismissed for default as appellants' counsel made no representation and handed over papers to clients for change of vakalath. No costs.
Second appeal dismissed for default as appellants' counsel made no representation and handed over papers to clients for change of vakalath. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S.A(MD)No.206 of 2006
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 23.07.2024
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR
S.A(MD)No.206 of 2006
1.A.Periakaruppan (Died)
2.Aavudaiammal ... Defendants/Appellants Appellants
3.Parameshwari
4.Malarvizhi
5.Shyamala Devi
6.Prema
7.Kannan
8.Sudha
9.Salumathi
... Appellants 3 to 9
(Appellants 3 to 9 are brought on record as LRs of the deceased first appellant vide order, dated 10.07.2014 made in M.P(MD)Nos.1 to 3 of 2014 in S.A(MD)No.206 of 2006)
Vs.
K.Pandithurai ... Plaintiff/Respondent Respondent
1/4
S.A(MD)No.206 of 2006
PRAYER : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree in A.S.No.78 of 2003 on the file of the Sub Judge, Periakulam, dated 28.07.2005, confirming the judgment and decree in O.S.No.220 of 1999 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Periakulam, dated 23.06.2003.
For Appellants : Mr.S.C.Herold Singh For Respondent : No appearance
JUDGMENT
When the Second Appeal was taken up for hearing on 18.07.2024, there was no representation for the appellants in the first call as well as in the second call. Hence, in order to give an opportunity to the appellants, the Registry was directed to list the matter under the caption 'For Dismissal'.
2. Today, the learned Counsel for the appellants made an
endorsement that he already handed over the papers to his client along with consent for change of vakalath. There is no other representation for the appellants.
2/4
S.A(MD)No.206 of 2006
3. Hence, the Second Appeal stands dismissed for default. There
23.07.2024
NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes BTR
To
3/4
S.A(MD)No.206 of 2006
S.SOUNTHAR, J.
BTR
Judgment made in S.A(MD)No.206 of 2006
Dated: 23.07.2024
1 provisions across 1 enactments
A.Periakaruppan (Died)
Aavudaiammal
Parameshwari
Malarvizhi
Shyamala Devi
Prema
S.Sounthar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court