Kalimuthan v. Murugandi
Case brief
What is this about?
Second appeal against concurrent decrees in a suit listed for dismissal after appellant's counsel reported no instructions. No representation appeared for the appellant, and the appeal was dismissed for default with no order as to costs.
What the court decided
S.A(MDNo.4 of 2007
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 12.04.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR
S.A(MD)No.4 of 2007
Kalimuthan ...Appellant -Vs1.Murugandi 2.Muruganantham ... Respondents
PRAYER : Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil
Procedure, to set aside the judgment and decree dated 31.07.2006 in A.S.No.45 of 2005 on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge, Paramakudi, confirming the judgment and decree dated 20.04.2005 in O.S.No.4 of 2001 on the file of the
learned District Munsif, Paramakudi.
For Appellant : No appearance For R1 : Mr.S.Sivathilakar
1/4
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Kalimuthan
- respondent
Murugandi
- respondent
Muruganantham
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court